Cyclists’ Use of Technology While on their Bike
Authors
Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) InteractionCyclists (Bicycle / E-bike / E-scooter)
Title of the Paper
Cyclists' Use of Technology While on Their Bike
Paper Information
- Domain: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and the use of cycling technology
- Keywords: cycling, mobile interaction, smartwatches, smartphones, bike computers, headphones, ethnomethodology, video ethnography
Research Background and Issues
-
Problems or Challenges:
- While existing research extensively focuses on technology use during driving, cycling as a mode of transportation and exercise has received limited exploration.
- Current studies on cycling technology design often emulate car dashboards rather than being specifically tailored for cycling environments.
- Immediate technology use during cycling may pose safety risks, yet there is little detailed analysis of how technology is used in real-world scenarios.
-
Significance:
- The global increase in cycling, especially during the pandemic and with growing environmental awareness, represents an important social trend.
- Understanding how cyclists use technology in dynamic environments is crucial for optimizing future technology designs and ensuring safety.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- HCI research on cycling technology is scarce; existing literature primarily focuses on safety design or technology prototypes, neglecting the timing and interaction behaviors of cyclists' self-selected technology use.
- This study aims to reveal patterns of technology use during cycling through remote ethnographic observation of cyclists' natural behaviors.
Solution
-
Methods or Solutions:
- Using an ethnomethodological approach, cyclists were recorded with 360-degree cameras mounted on handlebars to study their technology use during cycling.
- Analyzing how cyclists choose and execute technology interactions at specific moments.
-
Innovations:
- Proposing a new perspective for analyzing cyclists' immediate technology use behaviors, particularly how bodily movements prepare for technology interactions.
- Introducing the concept of "handlebar regionality" to guide future design and optimization of cycling technology.
-
Implementation Steps:
- Participant Recruitment and Data Collection:
- Cyclists were recruited through word-of-mouth and mailing lists.
- Cameras recorded cyclists' daily normal cycling spaces and behavioral data, avoiding artificial intervention.
- Video Data Analysis:
- Sorting and annotating 17 hours and 57 minutes of collected data to identify scenarios of technology use by cyclists.
- Using ethnomethodology to observe cyclists' actions before, during, and after technology use frame by frame.
- Participant Recruitment and Data Collection:
-
Key Technologies Used:
- 360-degree video recording equipment (GoPro MAX 360).
- Ethnographic analysis combined with thick description.
Research Findings
-
Specific Findings:
- Cyclists stabilize their bodies locally and choose appropriate moments to use technological devices.
- Proposed division of handlebars into "central" and "peripheral" regions, with cyclists primarily preparing and completing device interactions in the "central region."
-
Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:
- Provides detailed data on cyclists' immediate technology use behaviors, supplementing insights that laboratory or simulation studies cannot offer.
- Demonstrates the subtle coordination and dynamic diversity of behaviors in cycling technology use.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Cyclists can interact briefly and effectively with devices (smartwatches, headphones, smartphones) while maintaining bodily stability.
- By "observing changes in cyclists' hand and handlebar positions," patterns of cycling technology use were revealed.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Did not observe "non-explicit" technology use, such as device vibrations and sound prompts.
- Participants were predominantly male, with professional cycling backgrounds.
- Data collection was limited to Western Europe, excluding diverse climatic conditions.
- Future Directions:
- Conducting studies across diverse climatic conditions.
- Exploring the integration of device logs and screen recordings to capture complete interaction details.
- Designing interaction systems based on "handlebar regionality," such as supporting hand region changes to trigger relevant smart functions.
- Limitations:
Design Implications and Applications
- Cycling technology design should address cyclists' needs for stable hand and body positioning during dynamic device use, reducing risks during interactions.
- Proposing the concept of a "digital handlebar" as an interaction input trigger point, connected to devices to optimize cycling experience and safety.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How do cyclists choose and use technological devices in dynamic environments?Category: Attention Orchestration in Multi-Device EnvironmentsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do cyclists prepare for and complete technological interactions through body movements?Category: Attention Orchestration in Multi-Device EnvironmentsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How does handlebar zone partitioning affect cycling technology design?Category: Attention Orchestration in Multi-Device EnvironmentsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Using phones or devices while cycling may affect safety and experience.Category: Attention Orchestration in Multi-Device EnvironmentsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Grand challenges in CyclingHCI
DIS '24· Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) Interaction
- 100%
When the E-bike Takes Over: Speed Precision and Perception of Cruise Control for Cyclists
AutoUI '24· Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) Interaction
- 67%
An Exploratory Physical Computing Toolkit for Rapid Exploration and Co-Design of On-Bicycle Notification Interfaces
DIS '20· Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) Interaction +1
- 67%
Naturalistic E-Scooter Maneuver Recognition with Federated Contrastive Rider Interaction Learning
UbiComp '23· Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) Interaction +1
- 67%
Evaluating Interfaces for Non-Driving Related Tasks While Operating an E-scooter
AutoUI '25· In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal Feedback +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580971
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) Interaction
work
Professions
Cyclists (Bicycle / E-bike / E-scooter)
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
5 related papers