lightbulb现实痛点学术评审与反思支架学术期刊和会议论文的同行评审效率低、质量不高,影响学术进步。CSCW '24Beyond "Reviewer 2" Problems: Responding to the Peer Review Crisis in Computing Research
lightbulb现实痛点学术评审与反思支架批判性反馈常让作者感到挫败,降低修改动机。CHI '25Understanding and Supporting Peer Review Using AI-reframed Positive Summary
lightbulb现实痛点学术评审与反思支架新手评审者缺乏评审过程中的结构化指导,导致评审质量不一致。IUI '24ReviewFlow: Intelligent Scaffolding to Support Academic Peer Reviewing
lightbulb现实痛点学术评审与反思支架新手评审员难以写出高质量、有建设性的同行评审反馈。IUI '24Enhancing Peer Review with AI-Powered Suggestion Generation Assistance: Investigating the Design Dynamics
lightbulb现实痛点学术评审与反思支架科研评价体系过分强调技术新颖性,忽视研究的社会影响。CHI '24Seam Work and Simulacra of Societal Impact in Networking Research: A Critical Technical Practice Approach