Modeling and Reducing Spatial Jitter caused by Asynchronous Input and Output Rates
Authors
Jitter in interactive systems occurs when visual feedback is perceived as unstable or trembling even though the input signal is smooth or stationary. It can have multiple causes such as sensing noise, or feedback calculations introducing or exacerbating sensing imprecisions. Jitter can however occur even when each individual component of the pipeline works perfectly, as a result of the differences between the input frequency and the display refresh rate. This asynchronicity can introduce rapidly-shifting latencies between the rendered feedbacks and their display on screen, which can result in trembling cursors or viewports. This paper contributes a better understanding of this particular type of jitter. We first detail the problem from a mathematical standpoint, from which we develop a predictive model of jitter amplitude as a function of input and output frequencies, and a new metric to measure this spatial jitter. Using touch input data gathered in a study, we developed a simulator to validate this model and to assess the effects of different techniques and settings with any output frequency. The most promising approach, when the time of the next display refresh is known, is to estimate (interpolate or extrapolate) the user’s position at a fixed time interval before that refresh. When input events occur at 125 Hz, as is common in touch screens, we show that an interval of 4 to 6 ms works well for a wide range of display refresh rates. This method effectively cancels most of the jitter introduced by input/output asynchronicity, while introducing minimal imprecision or latency.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
Peripheral Notifications in Large Displays: Effects of Feature Combination and Task Interference
CHI '19· Visualization Perception & Cognition +1
- 67%
Characteristics of Deep and Skim Reading on Smartphones vs. Desktop: A Comparative Study
CHI '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Waiting Time Perceptions for Faster Count-downs/ups Are More Sensitive Than Slower Ones: Experimental Investigation and Its Application
CHI '24· Visualization Perception & Cognition +1
- 67%
Uncovering and Addressing Blink-Related Challenges in Using Eye Tracking for Interactive Systems
CHI '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Fragmented Moments, Balanced Choices: How Do People Make Use of Their Waiting Time?
CHI '24· Visualization Perception & Cognition +1
- 67%
MOSion: Gaze Guidance with Motion-triggered Visual Cues by Mosaic Patterns
CHI '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Perceived Asynchrony of Rhythmic Stimuli Affects Pupil Diameter and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
CHI '25· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)