Sprout: Crowd-Powered Task Design for Crowdsourcing
Authors
While crowdsourcing enables data collection at scale, ensuring high-quality data remains a challenge. In particular, effective task design underlies nearly every reported crowdsourcing success, yet remains difficult to accomplish. Task design is hard because it involves a costly iterative process: identifying the kind of work output one wants, conveying this information to workers, observing worker performance, understanding what remains ambiguous, revising the instructions, and repeating the process until the resulting output is satisfactory. To facilitate this process, we propose a novel meta-workflow that helps requesters optimize crowdsourcing task designs and Sprout, our open-source tool, which implements this workflow. Sprout improves task designs by (1) eliciting points of confusion from crowd workers, (2) enabling requesters to quickly understand these misconceptions and the overall space of questions, and (3) guiding requesters to improve the task design in response. We report the results of a user study with two labeling tasks demonstrating that requesters strongly prefer Sprout and produce higher-rated instructions compared to current best practices for creating gated instructions (instructions plus a workflow for training and testing workers). We also offer a set of design recommendations for future tools that support crowdsourcing task design.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Crowdsourcing Similarity Judgments for Agreement Analysis in End-User Elicitation Studies
UIST '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +2
- 75%
Online Sequencing of Non-Decomposable Macrotasks in Expert Crowdsourcing
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 75%
CrowdSurfer: Seamlessly Integrating Crowd-Feedback Tasks into Everyday Internet Surfing
CHI '23· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Crowdlicit: A System for Conducting Distributed End-User Elicitation and Identification Studies
CHI '19· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Crowdsourced Detection of Emotionally Manipulative Language
CHI '20· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Interface Design for Crowdsourcing Hierarchical Multi-Label Text Annotations
CHI '23· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Can we crowdsource Tacton similarity perception and metaphor ratings?
CHI '23· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 60%
Towards Fair and Equitable Incentives to Motivate Paid and Unpaid Crowd Contributions
CHI '25· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Explainable Modeling of Annotations in Crowdsourcing
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)