Crowdlicit: A System for Conducting Distributed End-User Elicitation and Identification Studies
Authors
End-user elicitation studies are a popular design method. Currently, such studies are usually confined to a lab, limiting the number and diversity of participants, and therefore the representativeness of their results. Furthermore, the quality of the results from such studies generally lacks any formal means of evaluation. In this paper, we address some of the limitations of elicitation studies through the creation of the Crowdlicit system along with the introduction of end-user identification studies, which are the reverse of elicitation studies. Crowdlicit is a new web-based system that enables researchers to conduct online and in-lab elicitation and identification studies. We used Crowdlicit to run a crowd-powered elicitation study based on Morris's "Web on the Wall" study (2012) with 78 participants, arriving at a set of symbols that included six new symbols different from Morris's. We evaluated the effectiveness of 49 symbols (43 from Morris and six from Crowdlicit) by conducting a crowd-powered identification study. We show that the Crowdlicit elicitation study resulted in a set of symbols that was significantly more identifiable than Morris's.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Crowdsourcing Similarity Judgments for Agreement Analysis in End-User Elicitation Studies
UIST '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +2
- 75%
Online Sequencing of Non-Decomposable Macrotasks in Expert Crowdsourcing
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 75%
Pay Attention, Please: Formal Language Improves Attention in Volunteer and Paid Online Experiments
CHI '19· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)
- 60%
"You Can Always Do Better!" The Impact of Social Proof on Participant Response Bias
CHI '18· Developing Countries & HCI for Development (HCI4D) +1
- 60%
Exploring the Quality, Efficiency, and Representative Nature of Responses Across Multiple Survey Panels
CHI '20· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Studying the Effects of Cognitive Biases in Evaluation of Conversational Agents
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 60%
Crowdsourced Detection of Emotionally Manipulative Language
CHI '20· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Interface Design for Crowdsourcing Hierarchical Multi-Label Text Annotations
CHI '23· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Can we crowdsource Tacton similarity perception and metaphor ratings?
CHI '23· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 60%
QButterfly: Lightweight Survey Extension for Online User-Interaction Studies for Non-Tech-Savvy Researchers
CHI '23· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)