BLEselect: Gestural IoT Device Selection via Bluetooth Angle of Arrival Estimation from Smart Glasses
Authors
"Spontaneous selection of IoT devices from the head-mounted device is key for user-centered pervasive interaction. BLEselect enables users to select an unmodified Bluetooth 5.1 compatible IoT device by nodding at, pointing at, or drawing a circle in the air around it. We designed a compact antenna array that fits on a pair of smart glasses to estimate the Angle of Arrival (AoA) of IoT and wrist-worn devices' advertising signals. We then developed a sensing pipeline that supports all three selection gestures with lightweight machine learning models, which are trained in real-time for both hand gestures. Extensive characterizations and evaluations show that our system is accurate, natural, low-power, and privacy-preserving. Despite the small effective size of the antenna array, our system achieves a higher than 90% selection accuracy within a 3 meters distance in front of the user. In a user study that mimics real-life usage cases, the overall selection accuracy is 96.7% for a diverse set of 22 participants in terms of age, technology savviness, and body structures. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569482"
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can Bluetooth 5.1 Angle of Arrival (AoA) estimation enable IoT device selection through smart glasses gesture control?Category: Gesture Sensing, Recognition Algorithms, and Sensor TechnologiesSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which gesture (nod, point, circle) is most precise and efficient for selecting IoT devices?Category: Gesture Sensing, Recognition Algorithms, and Sensor TechnologiesSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- To what extent can BLEselect balance accuracy, low energy consumption, and privacy protection?Category: Gesture Sensing, Recognition Algorithms, and Sensor TechnologiesSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users struggle to select IoT devices naturally while considering privacy and energy consumption.Category: Gesture Sensing, Recognition Algorithms, and Sensor TechnologiesSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Change Blindness in Proximity-Aware Mobile Interfaces
CHI '18· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
SmartObjects: Sixth Workshop on Interacting with Smart Objects
CHI '18· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
Explicating "Implicit Interaction": An Examination of the Concept and Challenges for Research
CHI '19· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
AdHocProx: Sensing Mobile, Ad-Hoc Collaborative Device Formations using Dual Ultra-Wideband Radios
CHI '23· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
Pixel Memories: Do Lifelog Summaries Fail to Enhance Memory but Offer Privacy-Aware Memory Assessments?
CHI '25· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
Vision-Based Multimodal Interfaces: A Survey and Taxonomy for Enhanced Context-Aware System Design
CHI '25· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
HaloTouch: Using IR Multi-Path Interference to Support Touch Interactions with General Surfaces
CHI '25· On-Skin Display & On-Skin Input +1
- 67%
PackquID: In-packet Liquid Identification Using RF Signals
UbiComp '23· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
GPS-assisted Indoor Pedestrian Dead Reckoning
UbiComp '23· Context-Aware Computing +1
- 67%
HearFire: Indoor Fire Detection via Inaudible Acoustic Sensing
UbiComp '23· Context-Aware Computing +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)