Tap to Sign: Towards using American Sign Language for text entry on smartphones
Authors
Soon, smartphones may be capable of allowing American Sign Language (ASL) signing and/or fingerspelling for text entry. To explore the usefulness of this approach, we compared emulated fingerspelling recognition with a virtual keyboard for 12 Deaf participants. With practice, fingerspelling is faster (42.5 wpm), potentially has fewer errors (4.02\% corrected error rate) and higher throughput (14.2 bits/second), and is as desired as virtual keyboard texting (31.9 wpm; 6.46\% corrected error rate; 10.9 bits/second throughput). Our second study recruits another 12 Deaf users at the 2022 National Association for the Deaf conference to compare the walk-up usability of fingerspelling alone, signing, and virtual keyboard text entry for interacting with an emulated mobile assistant. Both signing and virtual keyboard text entry were preferred over fingerspelling.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
WESPER: Zero-shot and Realtime Whisper to Normal Voice Conversion for Whisper-based Speech interactions
CHI '23· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +1
- 60%
Assessment of Sign Language-Based versus Touch-Based Input for Deaf Users Interacting with Intelligent Personal Assistants
CHI '24· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +1
- 60%
(Computer) Vision in Action: Comparing Remote Sighted Assistance and a Multimodal Voice Agent in Inspection Sequences
CHI '26· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)