An Interactive Relevance Feedback Interface for Evidence-Based Health Care
Authors
We design, implement and evaluate EpistAid, an interactive relevance feedback system to support physicians towards a more efficient citation screening process for Evidence Based Health Care (EBHC). The system combines a relevance feedback algorithm with an interactive interface inspired by Tinder-like swipe interaction. To evaluate its efficiency and effectiveness in the citation screening process we conducted a user study with real users (senior medicine students) using a large EBHC dataset (Epistemonikos), with around 400,000 documents. We compared two relevance feedback algorithms, Rocchio and BM25-based. The combination of Rocchio relevance feedback with the document visualization obtained the best recall and F-1 scores, which are the most important metrics for EBHC document screening. In terms of cognitive demand and effort, BM25 relevance feedback without visualization was perceived as needing more physical and cognitive effort. EpistAid has the potential of improving the process for answering clinical questions by reducing the time needed to classify documents, as well as promoting user interaction. Our results can inform the development of intelligent user interfaces for screening research articles in the clinical domain and beyond.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Towards Efficient Annotations for a Human-AI Collaborative, Clinical Decision Support System: A Case Study on Physical Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment
IUI '22· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 67%
Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processes
CHI '19· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation
- 60%
Get To The Point! Problem-Based Curated Data Views To Augment Care For Critically Ill Patients
CHI '22· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 60%
Patient Perspectives on AI-Driven Predictions of Schizophrenia Relapses: Understanding Concerns and Opportunities for Self-Care and Treatment
CHI '24· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 60%
Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer Patients
CHI '24· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 60%
Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 60%
AI-Supported Electrocardiogram Interpretation: The Effect of Support Presentation on Diagnostic Accuracy, Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Diagnosis Time
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 60%
Balancing Efficiency and Empathy: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on AI-Supported Workflows for Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)