Rationalizer: Leveraging LLM to Support User Providing the Rationales Behind the Rating of Likert Scale Questionnaires
Authors
Surveys, especially Likert scale questionnaires, are widely used in HCI to capture users’ attitudes and experiences, but numeric ratings alone provide little insight into the rationales behind those ratings. While adding open-ended text fields or post-questionnaire interviews can elicit richer explanations, they often impose extra effort, leading to survey fatigue or recall bias. To address this gap, we proposed Rationalizer, an LLM-supported questionnaire system that generates contextualized rationales to support participants articulate their explanations alongside each Likert item and rating. In a user evaluation comparing it with the traditional questionnaire that included open-ended text fields, Rationalizer increased the percentage of Likert items with rationales, sustained participants’ willingness to provide self-input rationales, and supported them in articulating longer explanations within comparable writing durations as the study progressed. Quality analyses further showed that Rationalizer yielded higher-quality rationales (i.e., justification and relevance) than the traditional questionnaire. These findings highlight the potential of LLM-supported questionnaires to enrich Likert ratings with contextualized, richer explanations.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
From Narrative to Numbers: Evaluating Survey Questionnaires with Large Language Models
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 86%
Evalet: Evaluating Large Language Models through Functional Fragmentation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 86%
Designing Staged Evaluation Workflows for LLMs: Integrating Domain Experts, Lay Users, and Model-Generated Evaluation Criteria
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 86%
Integrating Complementary Feature Sets for Human-AI Decision-Making
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 83%
AI of Oz: Enhancing Wizard of Oz Studies in HCI with AI Assistance for Human Moderation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Mapping the Wizards' Path: A Systematic Review of Wizard-of-Oz in HCI
CHI '26· Participatory Design +3
- 71%
Evaluating Generative AI in the Lab: Methodological Challenges and Guidelines
IUI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +3
- 63%
DALL: Data Labeling via Data Programming and Active Learning Enhanced by Large Language Models
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 63%
SemTabla: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Semantic Enrichment and Validation of Data Tables
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 63%
Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research Ideation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)