Adjust for Trust: Mitigating Trust-Induced Inappropriate Reliance on AI Assistance
Authors
Trust biases how users rely on AI assistance in decision-making tasks, with overly low and high levels of trust resulting in increased under- and over-reliance, respectively. We propose that AI assistants should adapt their behavior through trust-adaptive interventions to mitigate such inappropriate reliance. For instance, when user trust is low, providing an AI explanation can elicit more careful consideration of the assistant's advice by the user. In two decision-making scenarios---laypeople answering science questions and doctors making diagnoses---we find that providing supporting and counter-explanations during moments of low and high trust, respectively, yields up to 38% reduction in inappropriate reliance and 20\% improvement in decision accuracy. We are similarly able to reduce over-reliance by adaptively inserting forced pauses to promote deliberation. Our results highlight how AI adaptation to user trust facilitates appropriate reliance, presenting exciting avenues for improving human-AI collaboration.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 71%
Accuracy-Time Tradeoffs in AI-Assisted Decision Making under Time Pressure
IUI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI
CHI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Designing AI for Trust and Collaboration in Time-Constrained Medical Decisions: A Sociotechnical Lens
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Healthcare AI Treatment Decision Support: Design Principles to Enhance Clinician Adoption and Trust
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
How Do Users Experience Traceability of AI Systems? Examining Subjective Information Processing Awareness in Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Systems
IUI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 63%
High Accuracy and Hidden Disparities: Investigating Foundation Model Performance in Clinical Cognitive Assessment
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)