Towards Trustable Intelligent Clinical Decision Support Systems: A User Study with Ophthalmologists
Authors
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) presents significant opportunities for improving healthcare delivery, particularly in fields like ophthalmology. This paper explores the usability and trustworthiness of an AI-driven CDSS designed to assist ophthalmologists in treating diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Therefore, we created a CDSS and evaluated its impact on efficiency, informedness, and user experience through task-based semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with 11 ophthalmologists. The usability of the CDSS was rated highly, with a SUS of 81.75. Additionally, results show that participants felt like the CDSS would improve their efficiency and informedness with one major aspect being integrating Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) data into a single interface. Additionally, we explored aspects of the trustworthiness of AI components, specifically OCT segmentation, treatment recommendation, and visual acuity forecasting. Through thematic analysis, we identified key factors influencing trustworthiness and clinical adoption. Results show that a larger degree of abstraction from input to output of a model correlates with decreased trust. From our findings, we propose two guidelines for designing trustworthy CDSS.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Human-Centered Personalization in Radiology AI: Evaluating Trust, Usability, and Cross-Hospital Robustness
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
CheXplain: Enabling Physicians to Explore and Understand Data-Driven, AI-Enabled Medical Imaging Analysis
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 75%
Clinical Documentation as End-User Programming
CHI '20· Telemedicine & Remote Patient Monitoring
- 60%
“If I Had All the Time in the World”: Ophthalmologists' Perceptions of Anchoring Bias Mitigation in Clinical AI Support
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Harnessing Biomedical Literature to Calibrate Clinicians' Trust in AI Decision Support Systems
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Rethinking the Role of AI with Physicians in Oncology: Revealing Perspectives from Clinical and Research Workflows
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
``It Is a Moving Process'': Understanding the Evolution of Explainability Needs of Clinicians in Pulmonary Medicine
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Design and Multi-level Evaluation of MAP-X: a Medically Aligned, Patient-Centered AI Explanation System
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
SkinGEN: an Explainable Dermatology Diagnosis-to-Generation Framework with Interactive Vision-Language Models
IUI '25· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +1
- 60%
Diagnosing Medical Score Calculator Apps
UbiComp '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)