Human-Centered Personalization in Radiology AI: Evaluating Trust, Usability, and Cross-Hospital Robustness

Explainable AI (XAI)Telemedicine & Remote Patient MonitoringRadiologists & PathologistsPhysicians, Nurses & Clinicians

Paper Title

Human-Centered Personalization in Radiology AI: Evaluating Trust, Usability, and Cross-Hospital Robustness

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Human-centered AI for medical imaging diagnostics
  • Keywords: Radiology AI, federated learning, FFT harmonization, CLIP personalization, cross-hospital robustness, interpretability, patient trust, workflow integration, medical imaging, equity

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Variability in imaging devices and protocols across hospitals undermines diagnostic reliability, interpretability, and trust in AI systems. Existing federated learning methods fail to address clinical heterogeneity or provide sufficient personalization and transparency.
  • Significance: Addressing these challenges is critical for equitable and trustworthy AI adoption in healthcare, ensuring consistent diagnostics across institutions while preserving clinician agency and patient confidence.
  • Motivation and related work: Prior work on federated learning and domain adaptation has improved privacy and generalization but remains insufficient for managing clinical heterogeneity or integrating human-centered design principles. Medical AI systems often lack interpretability and fail to align with clinician workflows or patient expectations, leaving gaps in usability and trust.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: A federated learning framework combining FFT-based spectral harmonization and CLIP-based instruction-conditioned personalization to improve diagnostic robustness, interpretability, and equity across hospitals.
  • Novelty:
    1. Integration of FFT-based spectral harmonization to reduce device-induced variability while preserving anatomical fidelity.
    2. CLIP-based personalization enabling clinicians to steer diagnostic outputs using free-form textual instructions.
    3. Multi-level evaluation demonstrating technical performance, clinician usability, and patient trust across diverse hospitals and modalities.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • FFT harmonization adjusts amplitude spectra based on radiomics descriptors while preserving phase information for structural fidelity.
    • CLIP embeddings align textual instructions with reconstructed images, enabling semantic steering of outputs.
    • Federated learning aggregates encrypted model updates across hospitals, ensuring privacy while improving generalization.
    • Evaluation includes diagnostic accuracy, clinician workflow integration, and patient-centered outcomes across four hospitals and multiple imaging modalities.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Diagnostic accuracy improved significantly across tasks: polyp detection (0.88 ± 0.02), rotator cuff tear diagnosis (0.85 ± 0.03), pneumothorax classification (0.89 ± 0.02), and breast cancer segmentation (Dice = 0.82).
    • CLIP-based personalization increased text–image alignment (0.72 vs. 0.61 without personalization).
    • Reconstruction latency averaged 2.3–6.2 seconds across modalities, within clinically acceptable bounds.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • FFT harmonization improved cross-site performance by 3–5%, while CLIP personalization added 2–4% gains.
    • Robustness to device variability retained 91% of baseline performance under perturbations, compared to 77% for conventional federated learning.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Multi-level evaluation with 15 radiologists and 50 patients across four hospitals, covering modalities like endoscopy, ultrasound, X-ray, and CT.
    • Surveys and interviews assessed clinician workflow compatibility, interpretability, and patient trust.
    • Leave-one-hospital-out tests confirmed generalization across institutions.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Limited external validation across additional hospitals and devices.
    • Dependency on clinician-provided instructions, which may vary in clarity.
    • Need for medical-specific CLIP variants and expanded fairness auditing.
    • Prospective trials to measure downstream clinical impact and workflow integration.

Summary

This paper introduces a federated learning framework combining FFT harmonization and CLIP-based personalization to address cross-hospital variability in radiology AI. The system improves diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and equity while preserving privacy and clinician agency. Multi-level evaluations demonstrate robust performance across diverse modalities and institutions, with significant gains in patient trust and reduced anxiety. Future work will expand validation, enhance fairness auditing, and refine explanation interfaces to support broader adoption in clinical practice.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/222647/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791754
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Explainable AI (XAI), Telemedicine & Remote Patient Monitoring
work
Professions
Radiologists & Pathologists, Physicians, Nurses & Clinicians
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers