Robust Relatable Explanations of Machine Learning with Disentangled Cue-specific Saliency
Authors
Concept-based explanations help users understand the relation between model predictions and meaningful cues. However, under noisy real-world conditions, data perturbations lead to distorted and deviated explanations. We hypothesize that these corruptions affect specific cues rather than all, so disentangling them may help reduce model dependency on degraded cues. For the application of explaining emotional speech recognition, we propose RobustRexNet to explain with disentangled and discretized saliency maps for separate speech cues (e.g., loudness, pitch) to improve robustness against noise. Modeling evaluations show that RobustRexNet improved both model performance and explanation faithfulness in noisy and privacy-preserving distortions. User studies further indicate that the robust explanations aligned better with human intuition and improved user emotion labeling under noise. This work contributes toward robust explainable AI to improve user trust under real-world conditions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can reliable emotion analysis model explanations be generated under noisy conditions?Category: Explanation Form Design and Comprehension EffectsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can decomposing speech features (e.g., loudness, pitch, speech rate) improve intuitiveness and credibility of model explanations?Category: Explanation Form Design and Comprehension EffectsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can intuitive user-usable explanations be generated by comparing multiple emotional features?Category: Explanation Form Design and Comprehension EffectsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Noise or privacy protection weakens emotion recognition accuracy and explanation reliability.Category: Explanation Form Design and Comprehension EffectsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial Intelligence
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
"AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AI
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Planning for Natural Language Failures with the AI Playbook
CHI '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 67%
RiskRAG: A Data-Driven Solution for Improved AI Model Risk Reporting
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Do People Appropriately Rely on AI-Advice? An Analytical Review of HCI Research on Human-AI Decision-Making
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 60%
UMLAUT: Debugging Deep Learning Programs using Program Structure and Model Behavior
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Validating AI-Generated Code with Live Programming
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Supporting Co-Adaptive Machine Teaching through Human Concept Learning and Cognitive Theories
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Exploring the Design Space of Real-time LLM Knowledge Support Systems: A Case Study of Jargon Explanations
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)