Advancing Affective Intelligence in Virtual Agents Using Affect Control Theory

Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.)Agent Personality & AnthropomorphismGenerative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video)

Affective Intelligent Virtual Agents (AIVAs) has emerged as a research domain that integrates artificial intelligence, affective computing, and virtual agent technology. This fusion aims to develop interactive systems capable of perceiving, interpreting, and responding to human emotions. Affect Control Theory (ACT), a theoretical framework developed by Heise (1977) and adapted for virtual agent applications by Robillard and Hoey (2018) proposes that individuals unconsciously compare their own affective behavior with that of their interlocutor, forming predictions about the latter. Satisfaction and psychological stress levels are then influenced by the extent to which the interlocutor’s behavior aligns with these expectations. In this paper we introduce an AIVA that employs ACT concepts to interpret user text and generate emotionally-aligned responses, facial expressions, and gestures for an animated virtual character, AvataRena, that we are developing to act as a virtual life coach. Using the DeepMoji network, user textual input is mapped to emojis and then to a three-dimensional affect space. We then use prompt engineering to create ChatGPT responses that are moderated by ACT analyses to deliver emotionally-aligned textual and non-verbal responses. This alignment adheres to the principle of deflection within ACT, positing that lower deflection values correspond to heightened positivity in elicited emotions. To validate the model we performed a controlled simulation using 1480 questions derived from counselor-patient interactions to explore differences between prompt-engineered ChatGPT-generated responses with, and without, ACT moderation. Specifically, we found significantly lower deflection measures for the ACT-moderated AIVA responses, indicating that the moderated system adheres more closely to expected affective behavior than unmoderated ChatGPT. This was a large effect (t(1479)=-33.03, p<.001, Cohen's d = 0.862). Future work will investigate whether this promising result transfers to enhanced user satisfaction and response alignment during extended interactions in the life coach setting.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/iui/195774/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3708359.3712079
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
IUI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.), Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism, Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video)
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers