Slicing, Chatting, and Refining: A Concept-Based Approach for Machine Learning Model Validation with ConceptSlicer
Authors
As machine learning (ML) gains wider adoption in real-world applications, the validation of ML models becomes fundamental for its productization, particularly in safety-critical applications. Recently, data slice finding has emerged as a popular method for validating ML models, but it requires additional metadata or cross-modal embeddings for the slices to be interpretable. We propose ConceptSlicer, an integrated workflow that facilitates the slicing of computer vision models using visual concepts. This approach breaks down the image dataset into interpretable visual concepts, serving as metadata in the slice finding process. Our system offers insights into model issues and enables a deeper understanding of computer vision models' strengths and weaknesses. We evaluate ConceptSlicer through interviews with eight domain experts and machine learning practitioners, and fine-tune the ML models based on their feedback. Our study also highlights varied attitudes towards large foundational models, encouraging contemplation of the challenges and opportunities presented by this technological advancement.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can concept-based data slicing improve machine learning model validation?Category: Contextual Example Selection and Rare Pattern CoverageSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can metadata dependency in model optimization be eliminated in human-computer interaction?Category: Contextual Example Selection and Rare Pattern CoverageSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can foundation models (e.g., ChatGPT and CLIP) support model optimization in slice analysis?Category: Contextual Example Selection and Rare Pattern CoverageSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Data slicing and model optimization depend on metadata, making operations complex and costly.Category: Contextual Example Selection and Rare Pattern CoverageSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
Explanations as Mechanisms for Supporting Algorithmic Transparency
CHI '18· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
Incremental XAI: Memorable Understanding of AI with Incremental Explanations
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
User Ex Machina : Simulation as a Design Probe in Human-in-the-Loop Text Analytics
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 67%
RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-Consistency
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-Making
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Red Teaming LLMs as Socio-Technical Practice: From Exploration and Data Creation to Evaluation
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Comparables XAI: Faithful Example-based AI Explanations with Counterfactual Trace Adjustments
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
An Exploratory Study of Sociotechnical Issues for Anti-Money Laundering Workers
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
Designing Effective Training Dataset Explanations: The Impact of Information Depth and Progressive Disclosure
IUI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Transferable XAI: Relating Understanding Across Domains with Explanation Transfer
IUI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)