Joint Goal and Strategy Inference across Heterogeneous Demonstrators via Reward Network Distillation
Authors
Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved tremendous success as a general framework for learning how to make decisions. However, this success relies on the interactive hand-tuning of a reward function by RL experts. On the other hand, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) seeks to learn a reward function from readily-obtained human demonstrations. Yet, IRL suffers from two major limitations: 1) reward ambiguity - there are an infinite number of possible reward functions that could explain an expert’s demonstration and 2) heterogeneity - human experts adopt varying strategies and preferences, which makes learning from multiple demonstrators difficult due to the common assumption that demonstrators seeks to maximize the same reward. In this work, we propose a method to jointly infer a task goal and humans’ strategic preferences via network distillation. This approach enables us to distill a robust task reward (addressing reward ambiguity) and to model each strategy’s objective (handling heterogeneity). We demonstrate our algorithm can better recover task reward and strategy rewards and imitate the strategies in two simulated tasks and a real-world table tennis task.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 71%
Deep Learning for Understanding the Human
CHI '18· Human Pose & Activity Recognition +2
- 71%
Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
Are Two Heads Better Than One in AI-Assisted Decision Making? Comparing the Behavior and Performance of Groups and Individuals in Human-AI Collaborative Recidivism Risk Assessment
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research Landscape
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Understanding Compliance and Conversion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Collectives
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
LESS is More: Rethinking Probabilistic Models of Human Behavior
HRI '20· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +2
- 67%
Fair Machine Guidance to Enhance Fair Decision Making in Biased People
CHI '24· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 63%
Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Emulating Aggregate Human Choice Behavior and Biases with GPT Conversational Agents
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)