Understanding Roboticists' Power through Matrix Guided Power Analysis
Authors
Roboticists wield substantial power through the ways we choose to design and deploy robots. But understanding the nature of this power requires us to consider the different types of power wielded through different types of robot design choices, and the social and historical factors that shape the power landscape into which robots are embedded. To facilitate this type of analysis, I present Matrix-Guided Power Analysis (MGPA), a framework for analyzing the different types of power that technologists wield across different domains of power, with sensitivity to the social and historical forces that determine the default and alternative trajectories of those technologies. Further, I show how MGPA can be used to better understand the specific types of power that roboticists wield.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Power in Human-Robot Interaction
HRI '24· Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) +1
- 67%
Designing with Fallibility: Examining the Knowledge Politics of Agency, Methods, and Motivations in Robot Failure Research
CHI '26· Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) +2
- 67%
Spatial Robotic Experiences as a Ground for Future HRI Speculations
HRI '24· Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) +2
- 67%
More-than-human Perspective on the Robomorphism Paradigm
HRI '24· Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) +2
- 60%
Searching for the Non-Consequential: Dialectical Activities in HCI and the Limits of Computers
CHI '24· Technology Ethics & Critical HCI
- 60%
Inarticulate Devices: Critical Encounters with Network Technologies in Research Through Design
DIS '20· Technology Ethics & Critical HCI
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)