Reactive or Proactive? How Robots Should Explain Failures
Authors
As robots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the need for explanations becomes essential for gaining trust and acceptance. Explainable robotic systems should not only elucidate failures when they occur but also predict and preemptively explain potential issues. This paper compares explanations from Reactive Systems, which detect and explain failures after they occur, to Proactive Systems, which predict and explain issues in advance. Our study reveals that the Proactive System fosters higher perceived intelligence and trust and its explanations were rated more understandable and timely. Our findings aim to advance the design of effective robot explanation systems, allowing people to diagnose and provide assistance for problems that may prevent a robot from finishing its task.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Interactive Policy Shaping for Human-Robot Collaboration with Transparent Matrix Overlays
HRI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
"Should I Rely on You or the AI?" Leaders' Trust and Perceptions in Mixed Human-AI Teams
CHI '26· Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) +2
- 67%
"What do I do now?": Spontaneous Human Responses to Robot Effectiveness and Efficiency Malfunctions in Collaborative Robotics
CHI '26· Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) +2
- 60%
UMLAUT: Debugging Deep Learning Programs using Program Structure and Model Behavior
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial Intelligence
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Validating AI-Generated Code with Live Programming
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Supporting Co-Adaptive Machine Teaching through Human Concept Learning and Cognitive Theories
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Exploring the Design Space of Real-time LLM Knowledge Support Systems: A Case Study of Jargon Explanations
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Identifying Breakdowns in Conversational Recommender Systems using User Simulation
CUI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)