To Cuddle, Mingle, Venture, or Guide: How Architectural Affordances Influence the Experience of Social VR Places
Authors
Social virtual reality (VR) encompasses a growing network of three-dimensional virtual worlds where users interact in a shared, embodied way. While research has focused on the social interactions between the users themselves, less is known about how the design of virtual spaces influences these interactions. Our study combines interviews with 15 social VR users logging over 1,000 hours and a 20-hour spatial protocol of a purposeful sampling of VR worlds. We analysed how spatial characteristics (including proportion, sightlines, materiality, atmosphere, and navigation) influence meaningful user interaction to turn space into place. We synthesised four place types for a new social VR typology: Cuddle worlds that encourage cosy conversations; Mingle worlds that facilitate new encounters; Venture worlds that promote exploration; and Guided worlds that elicit a sense of belonging with the online community. By relating architectural affordances to social patterns, we contribute insights towards the purposeful design of social VR places.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
A Placebo Concert: The Placebo Effect for Visualization of Physiological Audience Data during Experience Recreation in Virtual Reality
CHI '25· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 67%
Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration Combining 360 Video and 3D Reconstruction
CHI '19· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Improving Humans' Ability to Interpret Deictic Gestures in Virtual Reality
CHI '20· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Phonetroller: Visual Representations of Fingers for Precise Touch Input when using a Phone in VR
CHI '21· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
SkyPort: Investigating 3D Teleportation Methods in Virtual Environments
CHI '22· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Digital Proxemics: Designing Social and Collaborative Interaction in Virtual Environments
CHI '22· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Going, Going, Gone: Exploring Intention Communication for Multi-User Locomotion in Virtual Reality
CHI '23· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Re-Evaluating VR User Awareness Needs During Bystander Interactions
CHI '23· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Exploring Experience Gaps Between Active and Passive Users During Multi-user Locomotion in VR
CHI '24· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
Disembodied, Asocial, and Unreal: How Users (Re)Interpret Designed Affordances of Social VR
DIS '24· Social & Collaborative VR +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)