“I'm a little less inclined to do it”: How Afterschool Programs’ Culture Impact Co-Design Processes and Outcomes

Algorithmic Fairness & BiasParticipatory DesignUser Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)K-12 TeachersSpecial Education TeachersEarly Childhood Educators

The importance of considering local context and partnering with target users is well established in co-design. Less common is an examination of the adaptations needed when deploying the same co-design program across heterogenous settings to maximize program efficacy and equity. We report on our experience co-designing educational games with six culturally and socioeconomically diverse afterschool sites over two years, and insights from interviewing ten program administrators across all sites. We found that even within the same afterschool program network, site differences in organizational culture and resources impacted the effectiveness of co-design programs, the co-design output, and expectations for student engagement. We characterize our afterschool partners into different archetypes – Safe Havens, Recreation Centers, Homework Helpers, and STEM Enrichment Centers. We provide recommendations for conducting co-design at each archetype and reflect on strategies for increasing equitable partnerships between researchers and afterschool centers.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/dis/118187/2023

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
DIS
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Algorithmic Fairness & Bias, Participatory Design, User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)
work
Professions
K-12 Teachers, Special Education Teachers, Early Childhood Educators
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
1 related papers