Public deliberations are often a staple ingredient in community decision-making. However, traditional, timeconstrained, in-person debates can become highly polarized, eroding trust in authorities, and leaving the community divided. This is the case in redistricting deliberations for public school zoning. Seeking for alternative ways of support, we evaluated the potential introduction of an online platform that combines multiple streams of data, visualises school attendance boundaries, and enables the manipulation of representations of land parcels. To capture multiple stakeholders’ values about the potential to enhance public engagement in school rezoning decision-making through an online platform, we conducted interviews with 12 participants with previous experiences in traditional, in-person deliberations. Insights from the interviews highlight the several roles an online platform could take, especially as it provides alternative means of participation (online, synchronous, and asynchronous). Additionally, we discuss the potential for technology to increase the visibility and participation of multiple community actors in public deliberations and present implications for design of future tools to support public decision-making.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/cscw/179541/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637393
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CSCW
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
—
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers