Content moderation practices and technologies need to change over time as requirements and community expectations shift. However, attempts to restructure the existing moderation practices can be difficult, especially for platforms that rely on their communities to moderate, because changes can transform the workflow and workload participants' reward systems. By examining the extensive archival discussions around a prepublication moderation technology on Wikipedia named Flagged Revisions, complemented by seven semi-structured interviews, we identify various challenges in restructuring community-based moderation practices. Thus, we find that while a new system might sound good in theory and perform well in terms of quantitative metrics, it may conflict with existing social norms. Furthermore, our findings underscore how the relationship between platforms and self-governed communities can hinder the ability to assess the performance of any new system and introduce considerable costs related to maintaining, overhauling, or scrapping any piece of infrastructure.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/cscw/178483/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686954
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CSCW
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
—
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers