Accessibility of Profile Pictures: Alt Text and Beyond to Express Identity Online
Title of the Paper
Accessibility of Profile Pictures: Alt Text and Beyond to Express Identity Online
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Research on the accessibility of social media images, particularly the description of profile pictures for blind and low-vision users and its impact on user experience
- Keywords: Accessibility, Image description, Screen readers, Blind users, Profile pictures, Avatars, Social platforms, Narrative voice
Research Background and Issues
-
Problems and Challenges Identified by the Authors:
- Profile pictures on social media are often inaccessible to blind and low-vision screen reader users.
- Even though some platforms allow users to add alt text (alternative text) descriptions, the quality of alt text for most profile pictures is low or absent.
- As a result, screen reader users face difficulties accessing image content, which impacts their ability to recognize identities, form first impressions, and engage in social interactions.
-
Importance:
Profile pictures are not only a means of self-expression but also an important tool for social interaction and identity recognition. When screen reader users cannot access this visual information, their ability to interact and engage socially is diminished. -
Motivation and Related Work:
The authors aim to explore how screen reader users perceive image descriptions, study their information needs and the impact of different description formats, and understand how sighted users view these issues. This work builds on prior research on image descriptions, identity expression, and social visibility.
Solutions
-
Proposed Methods or Solutions:
Based on two semi-structured interview studies:- Screen Reader User Study: Examining the needs and preferences for profile picture descriptions in different scenarios, including recruitment, corporate networking, and gaming forums.
- Sighted User Study: Gathering sighted users' perspectives on creating alt text and analyzing discrepancies with the needs of screen reader users.
-
Innovations:
- Introducing "narrative descriptions," where users record voice descriptions containing personal identity information, enhancing authenticity and emotional connection.
- Exploring the potential of "narrative descriptions" in forming first impressions and strengthening social interactions.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Designing virtual web pages with four styles of information: default description, brief description, detailed description, and narrative description.
- Observing user behavior in different social scenarios and extracting needs through high-quality interviews.
- Employing reflexive thematic analysis to process interview data and identify user preferences and information needs.
Research Findings
-
Specific Findings:
- Screen reader users generally prefer more detailed descriptions, as they help them perform tasks more effectively.
- Narrative descriptions, delivered through voice, enhance users' first impressions and add authenticity to the descriptions.
- Sighted users misunderstand the importance of describing background details, clothing, and other elements, which often do not align with screen reader users' preferences.
-
Comparative Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Provides more nuanced information style options, combining simple text descriptions with narrative voice to better meet real-world task needs.
- Encourages the use of acoustic and first-person language to enhance user trust.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Experiments show that adding details about background, social cues, and other elements significantly improves interaction experiences for blind users.
- Narrative descriptions help users establish deeper emotional connections and understanding, though they can be time-consuming.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- The study did not specifically include visually impaired users from marginalized racial or identity groups, which may affect the generalizability of the results.
- The study did not consider the impact of different cultural backgrounds on image description needs.
- Future Work:
- Explore best practices for personalized image descriptions in different scenarios.
- Further investigate how platform design can encourage users to provide high-quality alt text descriptions.
- Study narrative description standards for virtual avatars and specific description needs for different illustration styles.
- Limitations:
Design Implications
- Use first-person language to enhance the credibility of descriptions (e.g., "I am [name]") and incorporate such prompts into description templates.
- Develop interactive narrative description experiences to provide screen reader users with more flexible navigation options.
- Enhance platform tools to assist sighted users in creating high-quality alt text descriptions that meet the needs of screen reader users.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- What information should profile picture descriptions for BLV users on social media include to meet identity recognition and social interaction needs?Category: Web and Community Content AccessibilitySimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do alt-text descriptions created by sighted others differ from screen reader users' needs for profile pictures?Category: Web and Community Content AccessibilitySimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can narrative descriptions (conveying identity information through speech) enhance users' first impressions and emotional connection with others?Category: Web and Community Content AccessibilitySimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Blind users cannot effectively obtain identity information from social media profile pictures through screen readers.Category: Web and Community Content AccessibilitySimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
Diffscriber: Describing Visual Design Changes to Support Mixed-Ability Collaborative Presentation Authoring
UIST '22· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +1
- 75%
Screen Recognition: Creating Accessibility Metadata for Mobile Applications from Pixels
CHI '21· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +1
- 75%
Towards More Accessible Scientific PDFs for People with Visual Impairments: Step-by-Step PDF Remediation to Improve Tag Accuracy
CHI '25· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille)
- 67%
Visual Cues for Data Analysis Features Amplify Challenges for Blind Spreadsheet Users
CHI '24· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +2
- 67%
Human Robot Interaction for Blind and Low Vision People: A Systematic Literature Review
CHI '25· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +2
- 67%
A11y-CUA Dataset: Characterizing the Accessibility Gap in Computer Use Agents
CHI '26· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +2
- 60%
CodeTalk: Improving Programming Environment Accessibility for Visually Impaired Developers
CHI '18· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +1
- 60%
ALAP: Accessible LaTeX Based Mathematical Document Authoring and Presentation
CHI '19· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +1
- 60%
"I Bought This for Me to Look More Ordinary": A Study of Blind People Doing Online Shopping
CHI '19· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +1
- 60%
VIPBoard: Improving Screen-Reader Keyboard for Visually Impaired People with Character-Level Auto Correction
CHI '19· Voice Accessibility +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)