Regulating Responsibility: Environmental Sustainability, Law, and the Platformisation of Waste Management

Honorable Mention
Sustainable HCIEnergy Conservation Behavior & InterfacesGovernment Officials & Civil ServantsUrban PlannersEnvironmental Advocates

Title of the Paper

Regulating Responsibility: Environmental Sustainability, Law, and the Platformisation of Waste Management

Bibliographic Information

  • Authors: Rob Comber, Chiara Rossitto
  • Affiliations: Media Technology and Interaction Design Division, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University
  • Publication Year: 2023
  • Conference: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '23)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581493

Thematic Domain

  • Interaction between the digital platform economy and environmental sustainability, as well as legal and regulatory aspects of waste management.

Keywords

  • Waste management, platform economy, environmental regulation, law, environmental sustainability, digital intervention, responsibility, algorithmic governance, sustainable design

Research Background and Issues

  • Problem Statement: With the rise of digital platforms, the responsibility for waste management is shifting to individuals through algorithmic and digital interventions, potentially conflicting with traditional legal and regulatory frameworks.
  • Significance: Urban waste management is a crucial component of environmental sustainability, and digital interventions may impact the governance and allocation of responsibilities in waste processing, with profound implications for environmental health and social equity.
  • Research Motivation:
    • Investigate the intersection of technology and law in waste management.
    • Extend the theoretical framework of environmental care to new digital ecological contexts.
    • Address regulatory challenges posed by digital platforms in waste management.

Solutions

  • Approach:
    • Conduct an in-depth analysis of the legal dispute between the City of Stockholm and the waste management digital platform Tiptapp.
    • Utilize a theoretical framework of digital environmental governance to study the allocation of responsibilities in waste management.
  • Innovations:
    • Integrate legal and regulatory considerations into sustainable HCI research, proposing new methods for understanding environmental care.
    • Reveal the complex interactions between technology, regulation, and environmental care through legal analysis.
  • Key Techniques and Implementation Steps:
    • Analyze legal documents related to the case between Stockholm and Tiptapp, track case developments, and extract key themes.
    • Investigate how digital platforms reshape waste management processes through algorithmic governance and datafication.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Findings:
    • Comprehensive demonstration of how the legal framework for waste management is challenged by digital platforms, including reinterpretations of "waste" management responsibility and definitions of "care."
    • Identification of how digital processes (e.g., GPS tracking, image documentation) alter the allocation of waste management responsibilities.
    • Discussion of potential collaboration models between digital platforms and public sectors in the use and governance of waste data.
  • Advantages:
    • Reinterpretation of waste management processes under platformisation, providing a theoretical foundation for designing more effective environmental governance mechanisms.
    • Highlighting how legal interpretations influence the feasibility and societal legitimacy of digital solutions.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:
    • Tiptapp's operations were ultimately permitted by the court, demonstrating that legal regulations can adapt to digital innovations while posing new design challenges for environmental governance.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:
    • Limitations:
      • Analysis focused solely on a single legal case, lacking coverage of broader scenarios.
      • Legal document analysis did not directly capture the experiences and perspectives of involved parties.
    • Future Directions:
      • Explore how design processes can more comprehensively integrate regulations and technology.
      • Develop new design methodologies, such as legally sensitive design cards and regulatory prototypes, to support effective interactions between digital technologies and ecosystems.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/96253/2023

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581493
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Sustainable HCI, Energy Conservation Behavior & Interfaces
work
Professions
Government Officials & Civil Servants, Urban Planners, Environmental Advocates
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
3 related papers