A Human-Computer Collaborative Editing Tool for Conceptual Diagrams
Authors
Title of the Paper
A Human-Computer Collaborative Editing Tool for Conceptual Diagrams
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Human-Computer Collaboration, Conceptual Diagram Editing, Natural Interaction
- Keywords: Conceptual Diagrams, Natural Content Editing, Multimodal Interaction, Human-Computer Collaboration, Mobile Devices, Editing Tools, Artificial Intelligence, User Research, User Interface, Interaction Design
Research Background and Problem
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Editing tasks (e.g., conceptual diagram editing) involve numerous tedious GUI operations, particularly on mobile devices, leading to inefficiency and poor user experience.
- Users need to translate their goals into complex operations during editing tasks, resulting in high manual interaction costs.
- Most current tools either provide option suggestions only or rely entirely on AI to generate tasks, lacking effective collaboration mechanisms.
-
Significance:
- The widespread use of mobile devices has increased the demand for working anytime, anywhere, but traditional GUI interaction methods struggle to adapt to the constraints of mobile scenarios.
- Enhancing content editing efficiency and effectiveness is crucial for productivity in office work and various other fields.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Current human-computer collaboration systems mainly focus on annotation tools or AI generation tools, with little optimization for specific editing tasks.
- Existing multimodal interaction methods have not adequately addressed the issue of understanding users' ambiguous instructions (e.g., uncertain positions or attributes).
- A novel conceptual diagram editing tool could optimize task allocation by integrating AI and multimodal interaction, thereby reducing user interaction burdens.
Solution
-
Proposed Method or Solution:
- Designed and implemented a novel human-computer collaborative editing tool, SGDiag, which employs multimodal interaction (voice, gestures) combined with artificial intelligence to support fast and accurate diagram editing.
- The tool divides tasks so that humans and computers focus on their respective strengths: users describe goals with high-level ambiguous instructions, and the system processes these instructions to compute and recommend detailed actions.
- Provides candidate solutions and displays the logic behind them, enabling users to select the optimal solution.
-
Innovations:
- Proposed a new task allocation strategy: determining the functional distribution between humans and computers by observing user and human assistant interactions.
- Introduced AI and natural multimodal interaction into diagram editing tasks, significantly reducing user interaction burdens.
- The system intelligently completes missing content, resolves instruction conflicts, and recommends optimal solutions from multiple alternatives.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:
- Function Design:
- Defined task allocation through user behavior studies.
- The system supports completing ambiguous or missing information and resolving potential conflicts in user instructions.
- System Architecture:
- Implemented modules for instruction parsing, solution generation and recommendation, and intent prediction.
- Interaction Design:
- Supports a complete interaction process, including pre-command prediction, mid-command parsing, and result recommendation.
- Visualizes element relationships and the logic of topological relationships in candidate solutions.
- Content Modeling:
- Mathematically modeled user diagram content and its topological relationships (e.g., linear constraints on element positions).
- Function Design:
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Results:
- Identified feasible task allocation between users and the system through research.
- Successfully developed the collaborative editing tool SGDiag for conceptual diagrams, supporting multimodal interaction and operable on mobile devices.
- User experiments demonstrated that SGDiag improved editing efficiency (average increase of 32.75%) and result quality (score improvement of 21.89%) compared to existing tools.
-
Comparative Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Compared to traditional GUI-based tools, it reduces the need for precise user input, offering natural and effective interaction.
- Capable of handling ambiguities in user instructions and intelligently recommending resolutions for conflicts.
- Outperforms existing commercial applications (e.g., PowerPoint for Android) on mobile devices.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Two user studies were conducted with 16 and 24 participants, respectively. The results showed:
- SGDiag successfully generated reasonable candidate solutions, with users selecting the system's top recommendation in most cases.
- It significantly outperformed the baseline tool, PowerPoint, in terms of editing time and user experience.
- Users were able to quickly make decisions when accessing suggested intents and selecting candidate solutions, and they rated the tool highly for ease of use and intelligence.
- Two user studies were conducted with 16 and 24 participants, respectively. The results showed:
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Voice interaction in public settings may pose privacy concerns.
- The current tool lacks modeling for relationships between non-positional attributes and has limited capability for parsing semantic content.
- Further comparisons with more professional devices equipped with hardware support (e.g., drawing tablets) are needed.
- Future Directions:
- Extend to more tasks and devices, adding support for other interaction modes (e.g., gaze tracking, head gestures).
- Enhance semantic understanding of content and optimize modeling of non-linear relationships.
- Leverage machine learning to improve the robustness of voice command parsing.
- Limitations:
In summary, this paper proposes an innovative diagram editing tool, SGDiag, which significantly enhances efficiency and user experience through human-computer collaboration, natural interaction, and advanced AI technologies.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can human-AI task allocation in concept map editing effectively reduce users' interaction burden?Category: Human-in-the-Loop Labeling and Example SelectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can multimodal interaction (e.g., speech and gesture) help users edit concept maps more naturally?Category: Human-in-the-Loop Labeling and Example SelectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can systems handle ambiguous user instructions in concept map editing and recommend optimal solutions?Category: Human-in-the-Loop Labeling and Example SelectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users find concept map editing on mobile devices complex and inefficient.Category: Human-in-the-Loop Labeling and Example SelectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Data Visualization on Mobile Devices
CHI '18· Interactive Data Visualization
- 67%
Vistribute: Distributing Interactive Visualizations in Dynamic Multi-Device Setups
CHI '19· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 67%
Measuring the Separability of Shape, Size, and Color in Scatterplots
CHI '19· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 67%
Scraps: Enabling Mobile Capture, Contextualization, and Use of Document Resources
CHI '21· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 67%
Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
TableCanoniser: Interactive Grammar-Powered Transformation of Messy, Non-Relational Tables to Canonical Tables
CHI '25· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 67%
Trends, Challenges and Processes in Conversational Agent Design: Exploring Practitioners' Views through Semi-Structured Interviews
CUI '23· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Mitigating Response Delays in Free-Form Conversations with LLM-powered Intelligent Virtual Agents
CUI '25· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 67%
PDFChatAnnotator: A Human-LLM Collaborative Multi-Modal Data Annotation Tool for PDF-Format Catalogs
IUI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
Why and When LLM-Based Assistants Can Go Wrong: Investigating the Effectiveness of Prompt-Based Interactions for Software Help-Seeking
IUI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)