The "Three-Legged Stool": Designing for Equitable City, Community, and Research Partnerships in Urban Environmental Sensing

Smart Cities & Urban SensingCommunity Engagement & Civic TechnologyUrban PlannersHCI ResearchersSociologists & Anthropologists

Document Title

The “Three-Legged Stool": Designing for Equitable City, Community, and Research Partnerships in Urban Environmental Sensing

Document Information

  • Subject Area: Design and social collaboration in urban environmental sensor networks
  • Keywords: Co-design, smart cities, environmental monitoring, user interface, design framework

Research Background and Problems

  • Identified Problems or Challenges:

    • Urban environmental monitoring projects require collaboration among city agencies, community residents, and researchers; however, few projects genuinely include all three parties.
    • There is a lack of comprehensive, accurate, and actionable environmental data, and existing designs struggle to meet the needs of all stakeholders.
    • Sensor network design and data interfaces in smart cities urgently need innovation to ensure they serve environmental justice and local action.
  • Significance:

    • Against the backdrop of worsening air quality and environmental injustice, sensor data fails to effectively support policymaking and public action, hindering environmental justice and climate adaptation.
    • Environmental monitoring is crucial for improving community health and reducing pollution sources, but collaboration between communities and cities is still hindered by trust issues and resource constraints.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work:

    • Literature explores existing sensor network approaches such as community science and public-private partnerships but finds it challenging to balance the needs of all stakeholders.
    • Previous studies emphasize that participatory design can enhance trust between communities and governments, but in practice, the design process still faces power imbalances and collaboration difficulties.

Proposed Solution

  • Proposed Solution:

    • Introduce a “Three-Legged Stool” design framework that emphasizes balance, co-participation, and long-term collaboration among cities, communities, and researchers.
    • Implement a multi-phase design process, including initial partnership building, co-design of sensor networks, stakeholder perspective surveys, and data interface development to ensure equitable participation.
    • Design and deploy three data interfaces, including a website, API, and a mobile hybrid media lab (EcoPod), to enhance access to and use of environmental sensor data.
  • Innovations:

    • The “Three-Legged Stool Framework” emphasizes balance rather than hierarchical structures, overcoming traditional barriers between community science and government collaboration.
    • Provides socially and spatially embedded data interfaces, such as EcoPod, making data meaningful in local events and physical spaces.
    • Develops various tools for different data needs, including real-time visualization and public APIs, while focusing on education, interaction, and community empowerment.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:

    • The sensor network uses stratified random sampling combined with community-selected site layouts to achieve large-scale urban deployment.
    • QR codes and a public data access website are created for real-time air quality data visualization and distribution.
    • Develop the EcoPod mobile lab as a platform for community interaction and education, featuring sensor demonstrations and real-time data displays.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Outcomes:

    • A low-cost, long-term urban air quality sensor network (Eclipse) with significantly better coverage than traditional regulatory networks.
    • Through community participation, network coverage was enhanced in historically under-monitored environmental justice areas.
    • Data interfaces were used by various stakeholders, including communities, city agencies, media, and researchers, over more than a year.
  • Advantages:

    • Compared to existing models (with insufficient three-party participation), this network design demonstrated clear advantages in fairness and coverage in environmental monitoring.
    • EcoPod provided a socially and spatially embedded community access model, enhancing public engagement and data awareness.
    • The project extended its impact through local media coverage, creating conditions for long-term policy changes and public action.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:

    • Data showed that the sensor network significantly improved monitoring coverage for residents of all races and regions, with community-selected sites particularly concentrated in environmental justice areas near industrial and pollution sources.
    • EcoPod activities promoted community interaction and education, attracting attention from residents of all age groups, especially younger generations.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Limitations:
      • Differences in timing and communication occasionally limited the pace of three-party collaboration.
      • Low-code support for data analysis needs enhancement, especially for community users and grassroots governments with limited data processing capabilities.
      • The project team lacked long-term trust-building efforts with certain affected groups (e.g., Spanish-speaking communities).
    • Future Directions:
      • Enhance interface tools with spatiotemporal aggregation and interactive data analysis capabilities.
      • Test more community-led design and collaboration models.
      • Expand to other cities and environmental issues to validate the framework's universality and long-term effectiveness.

This study not only provides a practical collaboration framework for environmental monitoring but also sets a feasible direction for the design and implementation of socio-technical systems in smart cities.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/96205/2023

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581289
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
9 authors
sell
Subtopics
Smart Cities & Urban Sensing, Community Engagement & Civic Technology
work
Professions
Urban Planners, HCI Researchers, Sociologists & Anthropologists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers