Algorithmic prioritization is a growing focus for social media users. Control settings are one way for users to adjust the prioritization of their news feeds, but they prioritize feed content in a way that can be difficult to judge objectively. In this work, we study how users engage with difficult-to-validate controls. Via two paired studies using an experimental system -- one interview and one online study -- we found that control settings functioned as placebos. Viewers felt more satisfied with their feed when controls were present, whether they worked or not. We also examine how people engage in sensemaking around control settings, finding that users often take responsibility for violated expectations -- for both real and randomly functioning controls. Finally, we studied how users controlled their social media feeds in the wild. The use of existing social media controls had little impact on user's satisfaction with the feed; instead, users often turned to improvised solutions, like scrolling quickly, to see what they want.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/7744/2018

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2018
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Privacy by Design & User Control, Social Platform Design & User Behavior
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
4 related papers