SilentSpeller: Towards mobile, hands-free, silent speech text entry using electropalatography

Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS)Augmentative & Alternative Communication (AAC)Disability Service ProvidersAssistive Technology Specialists

Title of the Paper

SilentSpeller: Towards mobile, hands-free, silent speech text entry using electropalatography

Bibliographic Information

  • Research Area: Human-Computer Interaction and Text Input Technology
  • Keywords: Wearable Computing, Silent Speech Interface, Text Input, Tactile Sensing, Human-Computer Interaction, Mobile Technology

Research Background and Issues

  • Identified Problems and Challenges:

    • Voice input is unsuitable in many situations, such as when privacy is required or under social constraints.
    • Existing silent speech recognition technologies are limited by vocabulary size (typically supporting only around 100 words) and require users to remain stationary.
    • Few studies focus on real-time input testing, as most methods are confined to offline experiments, potentially overestimating their effectiveness.
  • Significance of the Research:

    • Provides an alternative input method for users with limited finger dexterity (e.g., those with muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, etc.).
    • Addresses the limitations of manual input and the challenges of using voice control in social settings, enhancing input efficiency and privacy protection.
  • Motivation and Related Work:

    • While voice input offers advantages in convenience and learnability, existing silent speech recognition methods rely on specific devices, require extensive training data, and lack user independence across different individuals.

Solution

  • Method and Approach:

    • Developed the SilentSpeller system, enabling users to input text by silently spelling letters.
    • Utilized a device called SmartPalate, consisting of a dental retainer embedded with 124 capacitive touch sensors to monitor tongue movements against the hard palate.
  • Innovations:

    • Introduced silent spelling as an alternative to silent speech, improving recognition rates and vocabulary generality through letter-by-letter input.
    • Supported a dictionary of over 1,000 words and enabled usage while walking.
    • Provided a real-time input experience with stable operation in mobile and dynamic scenarios.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:

    1. Hardware Utilization:
      • The SmartPalate device samples tongue activity in real-time at a frequency of 100 Hz.
    2. Data Compression:
      • Applied Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to reduce 124 original sensor signals to 16 components ("eigen-palates").
    3. Recognition Model:
      • Used Hidden Markov Models (HMM) for temporal pattern matching to decode spelling into text.
    4. User Training:
      • Trained user recognizers with 2,328 words and an additional 107 short phrases.
    5. Dictionary Expansion:
      • Supported generalization tests for unseen words and allowed input of user-specific proper nouns.

Research Results

  • Specific Outcomes:

    • In offline word input experiments, the average character accuracy for a 1,164-word vocabulary reached 97%.
    • Training data traversal showed optimal learning effects with approximately 1,500 training words.
    • When testing user input for unknown words, the system achieved an average character recognition rate of 94.5%, demonstrating a certain degree of generalization capability.
    • Input accuracy was almost unaffected by walking versus sitting scenarios (96.5% sitting, 97.5% walking).
    • Real-time input experiments achieved 37 words per minute with an accuracy of 87%.
  • Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:

    • More suitable for operation during movement compared to other silent speech interfaces.
    • Lower user training time cost, making it ideal for personalized input systems.
    • Offers real-time input functionality, enhancing practical applicability compared to offline tests.
  • Experimental Results:

    • Performance in multi-user comparisons was close to the average input speed of smartphone virtual keyboards (embedded QWERTY at 48 wpm).
    • Users showed significant improvement in familiarity with SilentSpeller over the course of the experiments, with continuous performance enhancement trends.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Currently requires users to wear specialized hardware (dental retainer), limiting its adoption in social environments.
    • Lacks user-independent training models; future work will explore user adaptability improvements based on big data.
    • Hardware improvements could include adding lip motion capture sensors, adopting wireless communication modules (e.g., Bluetooth Low Energy), and optimizing device comfort for wearability.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/69004/2022

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3491102.3502015
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2022
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
10 authors
sell
Subtopics
Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS), Augmentative & Alternative Communication (AAC)
work
Professions
Disability Service Providers, Assistive Technology Specialists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
3 related papers