Diffraction-in-action: Designerly Explorations of Agential Realism Through Lived Data
Honorable MentionAuthors
Document Title
Difraction-in-action: Designerly Explorations of Agential Realism Through Lived Data
Document Information
- Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Data Design, Sensory Augmentation Design
- Keywords: Biodata, Material, Bodies, Data, Collaboration, Empathy, Being-with, More-than-human, Design, Design Research
Research Background and Problem
-
Problems or Challenges:
- Data is often regarded as an objective and abstract "commodity fiction," ignoring its context, origin, and temporal factors.
- How can designers "interact" with data and go beyond traditional frameworks of reflection and representation?
- Lack of specific cases illustrating how agential realism can be practically applied in design research.
-
Research Significance:
- Exploring the intertwining of data and daily life to provide methods for a more human-centered data-driven society.
- Reevaluating the systemic production of data, its potential issues, and meanings to drive innovation in HCI design methodologies.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Using agential realism methodology to shift the focus from data "reflecting the world" to "co-creating" new meanings of data.
- Previous studies primarily focused on individual behaviors in data usage (e.g., lived informatics) but lacked emphasis on designers' perspectives and practices.
Solution
-
Main Methods/Solutions: The authors propose a design method for "lived data," promoting diffractive data analysis aimed at understanding the ambiguity, temporality, and social context of data.
-
Innovations:
- Introduced a novel perspective of data as a design material, not only using data but also treating data design itself as a practical issue.
- Emphasized "living with data" to generate new social, ethical, and technological connections.
- Operationalized agential realism theory to advance design research centered on human body data.
-
Implementation Steps and Techniques: The authors elaborate on this method through several case studies:
-
Case Study 1: Breathing Shell—using a pressure-sensing inflatable cushion to perceive breathing changes.
- Applied soma design methods, engaging in prolonged breathing exercises and sensor interactions to redefine "breathing" data.
- Innovatively designed a deformable material sensing platform to perceive and transmit breathing patterns.
-
Case Study 2: Pee-ometer—exploring urination behavior data.
- Used autobiographical design methods to model urination urges, gradually uncovering their social contextual characteristics.
-
Case Study 3: Ripple—using color-changing fabric to display emotional skin conductivity data.
- Demonstrated how biosensing data is "generated" through the interplay of social, material, and cultural phenomena.
-
Case Study 4: Affect Health—exploring user interaction with skin conductivity data through an application.
- Tested animated color visuals to help users interpret data in various life contexts.
-
Case Study 5: Comparing manual logs and automated mobile movement data to explore differences in mobility data.
- Highlighted the social infrastructure and contextual factors underlying data practices.
-
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Outcomes:
-
Extracted design principles:
- Data design should be an open-ended, undefined process.
- Resist the impulse for efficiency by revealing the complexity of data contexts through slow, long-term processes.
- Preserve data ambiguity to allow multiple interpretations and diverse insights.
-
Validated the practical feasibility of diffractive data design and its impact on design decisions through case studies.
-
Expanded the data framework from a static tool to a dynamic phenomenon, shifting from representing the world to co-creating the world.
-
-
Advantages:
- Challenged traditional perceptions of data as a mirror reflecting phenomena, proposing a new method centered on phenomena with data as a design tool.
- Extended the application paradigm of data as a design material through detailed cases of human body data measurement and interpretation.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- The case studies demonstrated that this method significantly enhances designers' understanding of data complexity and its ambiguous applications.
- User testing revealed that the diverse interpretations of ambiguous data could help users discover new behavioral patterns or self-reflection pathways.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The research remains primarily human-centered, focusing on bodies and designers, without delving into possibilities in automated systems or machine learning.
- Most cases are situated within European and North American contexts, lacking perspectives on cultural, identity, and social diversity.
- Future research could extend similar methods to machine learning or non-human data domains, exploring more complex real-world application scenarios.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can designers transcend traditional frameworks of data reflection and representation through diffractive data analysis?Category: GenAI Critique, Ethics, and Design Methodology ReflectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- When treating data as design material, how can ambiguity, temporality, and social context be preserved in design?Category: GenAI Critique, Ethics, and Design Methodology ReflectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can agential realism be operationalized in design practice and influence data-driven design decisions?Category: GenAI Critique, Ethics, and Design Methodology ReflectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Designers struggle to effectively transform everyday data into socially meaningful design material.Category: GenAI Critique, Ethics, and Design Methodology ReflectionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)