Paracentral and near-peripheral visualizations: Towards attention-maintaining secondary information presentation on OHMDs during in-person social interactions
Honorable MentionAuthors
Title of the Paper
Paracentral and Near-Peripheral Visualizations: Towards Attention-Maintaining Secondary Information Presentation on OHMDs During In-Person Social Interactions
Paper Information
- Research Area: Human-Computer Interaction, Information Visualization Design for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays (OHMDs)
- Keywords: Paracentral, Near-peripheral, Social Interaction, Face-to-Face Communication, Circular Progress Bar, Notifications, Interruptions, HMD, Smart Glasses
Research Background and Problem
-
Issues and Challenges:
- Optical see-through head-mounted displays (OHMDs) provide real-time information support but may distract users from primary tasks such as face-to-face interactions.
- Current notification systems can reduce the quality of social interactions, such as diminishing eye contact.
- How to display secondary information in social contexts without interfering with primary tasks (e.g., facial visual attention) remains an unresolved issue.
-
Significance:
- In an increasing number of social and work scenarios, users need to handle multiple sources of information simultaneously without disrupting primary tasks.
- Leveraging the characteristics of the human "paracentral" and "near-peripheral" visual regions may offer an innovative solution to minimize interference with core attention areas.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Previous studies have proposed using peripheral vision to allocate secondary information and reduce the load on central visual areas.
- However, while mid-to-far peripheral vision excels at motion detection, its ability to discern details is limited. This necessitates exploring the potential of "paracentral" and "near-peripheral" regions.
- This paper designs a "circular progress bar" interface for OHMDs to display information in these underexplored visual regions.
Solution
-
Proposed Method:
- Designed and compared three progress notification display methods: "circular progress bar," "linear progress bar," and "text label," to study their effects on user attention and secondary information reception.
- Envisioned the use of these three information representations in paracentral and near-peripheral visual regions.
-
Innovations:
- Proposed utilizing the human paracentral and near-peripheral visual regions to display secondary information, enabling users to maintain eye contact while receiving notifications.
- Introduced the "circular progress bar," which aligns with natural visual characteristics.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- The experiment consisted of two parts:
- Simulated Experiment: Tested the impact of the three display methods on progress information recognition and eye contact quality in a hypothetical digital character dialogue scenario.
- Realistic Experiment: Further validated the design results in real-life dialogue contexts involving a wearer and a conversation partner.
- Used Microsoft HoloLens2 as the OHMD device and developed the progress bar display using Unity.
- Tested two progress bar presentation modes (continuous and intermittent), ultimately selecting intermittent display to reduce conversation interruptions.
- The experiment consisted of two parts:
Research Findings
-
Specific Results:
-
Experiment 1 (Simulated Scenario):
- The circular progress bar showed higher information recognition accuracy (96.32%) compared to the linear progress bar and text label, with minimal gaze shifts.
- Text labels were difficult to recognize in peripheral visual regions, especially for curved digits (e.g., 3, 8).
- Most participants (83%) preferred the circular progress bar, considering it the least disruptive to conversations.
-
Experiment 2 (Realistic Scenario):
- Participants found the circular progress bar most effective, providing higher notification salience and comfort, with most users reporting a more relaxed experience.
- Although text labels offered quick viewing advantages for some users, the precision required for reading numbers caused higher mental stress.
- Observers did not perceive unnatural eye behavior from OHMD wearers, indicating minimal impact of the notification design on social interactions.
-
-
Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- The circular progress bar, by aligning with paracentral and near-peripheral visual regions, significantly reduced notification interference with primary tasks such as conversations.
- Provided an innovative human-computer interaction design that preserves user attention while effectively conveying secondary information.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Both subjective and objective data showed that the circular progress bar outperformed the other two modes in terms of information delivery efficiency and user satisfaction.
- Data indicated that while the linear progress bar was less intuitive than the circular one, it still had certain applications in pre-positioned information scenarios.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
-
Limitations:
- The experiment lacked precise tracking of the specific usage of visual regions (paracentral/near-peripheral).
- Testing was limited to younger users with high technological acceptance, without covering a diverse age range or varied usage scenarios.
- The device used (HoloLens2) is relatively bulky, which might affect the naturalness of social interactions in real-world settings.
-
Future Directions:
- Conduct tests with a broader demographic (e.g., elderly users) to validate the design's applicability.
- Explore applications and adaptability in other multitasking scenarios, such as public speaking or group meetings.
- Optimize the circular progress bar's display, such as visual adjustments for time-critical notifications.
-
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- In face-to-face social interaction, how can secondary information be displayed on OHMD without disrupting users' facial visual attention?Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do circular progress bars, linear progress bars, and text labels differ in information reception efficiency and attentional disruption?Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Does intermittent progress bar display reduce social interaction disruption more than continuous display?Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- When wearing smart glasses, users are easily distracted by notifications during social interaction, reducing eye contact.Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
SwitchSpace: Understanding Context-Aware Peeking Between VR and Desktop Interfaces
CHI '24· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
- 67%
Towards Understanding Diminished Reality
CHI '22· Mixed Reality Workspaces +2
- 67%
ParaGlassMenu: Towards Social-Friendly Subtle Interactions in Conversations
CHI '23· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 67%
Wearable AR in Everyday Contexts: Insights from a Digital Ethnography of YouTube Videos
CHI '25· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 67%
How your Physical Environment Affects Spatial Presence in Virtual Reality
CHI '25· Mixed Reality Workspaces +2
- 67%
MiniMates: Miniature Avatars for AR Remote Meetings within Limited Physical Spaces
CHI '25· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 67%
SelectVisAR: Selective Visualisation of Virtual Environments in Augmented Reality
DIS '21· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 67%
Experiencing the World through Imperfect Lenses: An Autoethnography of Living in Mixed Reality
DIS '25· Mixed Reality Workspaces +2
- 67%
PaperToPlace: Transforming Instruction Documents into Spatialized and Context-Aware Mixed Reality Experiences
UIST '23· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
- 67%
InteractionAdapt: Interaction-driven Workspace Adaptation in Situated Virtual Reality
UIST '23· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)