How Social Dynamics and the Context of Digital Content Impact Workplace Remix
As highlighted in recent work on remix in online content creation communities, people commonly take and appropriate digital content for new activities. Less is known, however, about how people repurpose digital content as part of work. We report findings from an interview study with 19 individuals in which we explored how digital content in the workplace becomes a material for remix. Our analysis emphasizes (i) how digital content is obtained from colleagues for remix, (ii) how content is made available for remix by others, and (iii) how digital content is transformed for remix. In attending to these broader processes of remix, we consider the roles of workplace technologies, such as those for file sharing, as well as social norms that mediate access, remix, and acknowledgement. We draw implications for design of technology that emphasize support for individuals in making digital content available for remix, and raising awareness of the context of that content.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 60%
AdaM: Adapting Multi-User Interfaces for Collaborative Environments in Real-Time
CHI '18· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
- 60%
Proxemics Beyond Proximity: Designing for Flexible Social Interaction Through Cross-Device Interaction
CHI '20· Distributed Team Collaboration +1
- 60%
MirrorBlender: Supporting Hybrid Meetings with a Malleable Video-Conferencing System
CHI '21· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
- 60%
VRGit: A Version Control System for Collaborative Content Creation in Virtual Reality
CHI '23· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
- 60%
Blended Whiteboard: Physicality and Reconfigurability in Remote Mixed Reality Collaboration
CHI '24· Mixed Reality Workspaces +1
- 60%
CorpusStudio: Surfacing Emergent Patterns In A Corpus Of Prior Work While Writing
CHI '25· AI-Assisted Creative Writing +1
- 60%
Focused Live Programming with Loop Seeds
UIST '20· Creative Collaboration & Feedback Systems +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)