Technology and the givens of existence: Toward an existential inquiry framework in HCI research
Honorable MentionAuthors
The profound impact of digital technologies on human life makes it imperative for HCI research to deal with the most fundamental aspects of human existence. Arguably, insights from existential philosophy and psychology are highly relevant for addressing such issues. Building on previous attempts to bring in existential themes and terminology to HCI, this paper argues that Yalom’s notion of “the givens of existence”, as well as related work in experimental existential psychology, can inform the development of an existential inquiry framework in HCI. The envisioned framework is intended to complement current approaches in HCI by specifically focusing on the existential aspects of the design and use of technology. The paper reflects on possible ways, in which existential concepts can support HCI research, and maintains that adopting an existential framework in HCI would be consistent with the overall conceptual development of the field.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
(Re)Politicizing Digital Well-Being: Beyond User Engagements
CHI '22· Privacy by Design & User Control +1
- 80%
How does HCI Understand Human Agency and Autonomy?
CHI '23· Privacy by Design & User Control +1
- 67%
(Un)Acceptable!?! -- Re-thinking the Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies
CHI '18· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 67%
Ontologies in Design: How Imagining a Tree Reveals Possibilities and Assumptions in Large Language Models
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
From Tool to Partner: The Evolution of Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '18· Technology Ethics & Critical HCI
- 60%
Searching for the Non-Consequential: Dialectical Activities in HCI and the Limits of Computers
CHI '24· Technology Ethics & Critical HCI
- 60%
Inarticulate Devices: Critical Encounters with Network Technologies in Research Through Design
DIS '20· Technology Ethics & Critical HCI
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)