An Evaluation of Radar Metaphors for Providing Directional Stimuli Using Non-Verbal Sound
Authors
We compared four audio-based radar metaphors for providing directional stimuli to users of AR headsets. The metaphors are clock face, compass, white noise, and scale. Each metaphor, or method, signals the movement of a virtual arm in a radar sweep. In a user study, statistically significant differences were observed for accuracy and response time. Beat-based methods (clock face, compass) elicited responses biased to the left of the stimulus location, and non-beat-based methods (white noise, scale) produced responses biased to the right of the stimulus location. The beat methods were more accurate than the non-beat methods. However, the non-beat methods elicited quicker responses. We also discuss how response accuracy varies along the radar sweep between methods. These observations contribute design insights for non-verbal, non-visual directional prompting.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
TAGSwipe: Touch Assisted Gaze Swipe for Text Entry
CHI '20· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Hummer: Text Entry by Gaze and Hum
CHI '21· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Integrating Gaze and Speech for Enabling Implicit Interactions
CHI '22· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
EyeSayCorrect: Eye Gaze and Voice Based Hands-free Text Correction for Mobile Devices
IUI '22· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
M^2Silent: Enabling Multi-user Silent Speech Interactions via Multi-directional Speakers in Shared Spaces
CHI '25· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
- 67%
ThumbAir: In-Air Typing for Head Mounted Displays
UbiComp '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
- 67%
Viago: Exploring Visual-Audio Modality Transitions for Social Media Consumption on the Go
UIST '25· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)