Interoceptive Interaction: An Embodied Metaphor Inspired Approach to Designing for Meditation
Haptic WearablesShape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials
Title of the Paper
Interoceptive Interaction: An Embodied Metaphor Inspired Approach to Designing for Meditation
Paper Information
- Domain: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Meditation Technology Design
- Keywords: Meditation Technology, Embodied Metaphor, Tactile Feedback, Thermal Feedback, Interoceptive Interaction
Research Background and Issues
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Meditation is a mind-body practice with significant health benefits, but beginners often struggle to regulate their attention.
- Existing meditation technologies typically use visual or auditory metaphors to represent meditation states, but these designs rarely consider theoretical foundations and may divert attention away from bodily perception.
- How internal bodily sensations (e.g., thermal perception) can be utilized to enhance the effectiveness of meditation tools remains underexplored.
-
Significance:
- Mastering meditation skills requires long-term practice, and for beginners, technological tools that support attention regulation can significantly improve learning and meditation experiences.
- Mapping meditation experiences to internal bodily sensations can enhance bodily awareness, which is a core aspect of meditation practice.
-
Motivation and Related Work:
- Current meditation technologies mostly rely on external visual and auditory metaphors rather than interoceptive mappings.
- Limited research suggests that tactile feedback, particularly thermal feedback, has pleasant and non-distracting characteristics suitable for supporting meditation.
Solution
-
Method or Solution:
- Introduced the concept of "Interoceptive Interaction," which maps meditation states to internal bodily sensations.
- Designed an experimental prototype, WarmMind, that links meditation states through thermal feedback.
- Developed thermal feedback patterns based on embodied metaphor theory, where "focused state" is mapped to stable warmth, "mind-wandering state" to random thermal sensations, and "state transitions" to structured thermal changes.
-
Innovations:
- Expanded meditation technology into the domain of "interoceptive interaction," emphasizing interaction with internal bodily sensations.
- For the first time, explored thermal patterns for metaphorical mapping of meditation states and compared two different feedback modalities (auditory and thermal).
- Proposed a preliminary design framework to guide metaphorical mapping in meditation technology.
-
Implementation Steps and Techniques:
- Created a thermal feedback prototype, WarmMind, including a heating pad, microprocessor, and customized thermal patterns.
- Designed thermal patterns using embodied metaphor theory, exploring sensory experiences such as duration and rhythm of thermal feedback.
- Conducted user studies comparing WarmMind's thermal patterns with a traditional auditory feedback system (Muse app).
- Analyzed the impact of the two feedback modalities on attention regulation and meditation experience.
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Findings:
- Thermal feedback was experienced by users as an internal sensation, supporting bodily awareness.
- Auditory feedback was advantageous in terms of metaphor recognition but was perceived as potentially distracting; in contrast, thermal feedback was subtler and promoted attention regulation.
- The preliminary framework summarized three core qualities of metaphorical mapping during design: sensory richness (rich or delicate), temporality (continuous or discrete), and metaphor familiarity (familiar or ambiguous).
-
Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Interoceptive interaction avoids the attention diversion often caused by traditional external visual or auditory interfaces.
- Although thermal feedback mappings are less intuitive, they provide a novel and non-intrusive form of meditation support.
-
Experimental Results:
- Auditory feedback users found it easier to perceive state changes but struggled to focus on breathing.
- Thermal feedback was perceived as gentler and naturally facilitated attention regulation, though the metaphor recognition was lower.
- Statistical analysis did not show significant differences in meditation states between feedback modalities, but thermal feedback participants exhibited a stronger inclination toward bodily awareness.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The metaphorical expression of thermal feedback requires further optimization, such as reducing complexity to improve user understanding.
- More meditation-related bodily metaphors should be explored, such as associating core area warmth with meditation states.
- Systems incorporating multiple sensory modalities should be developed to support personalized meditation experience design.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can meditative states be mapped to interoceptive sensations (e.g., heat) to improve meditation tool effectiveness?Category: Haptic Experience, Material Perception, and Body AwarenessSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do thermal and auditory feedback compare in regulating attention and meditation experience?Category: Haptic Experience, Material Perception, and Body AwarenessSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do heat-feedback patterns designed from embodied metaphor theory influence meditation technology design?Category: Haptic Experience, Material Perception, and Body AwarenessSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Beginners struggle to focus during meditation, and traditional tool design easily distracts attention.Category: Haptic Experience, Material Perception, and Body AwarenessSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Springlets: Expressive, Flexible and Silent On-Skin Tactile Interfaces
CHI '19· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
Wireality: Enabling Complex Tangible Geometries in Virtual Reality with Worn Multi-String Haptics
CHI '20· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
ThreadSense: Locating Touch on an Extremely Thin Interactive Thread
CHI '20· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
Interaction with Touch-Sensitive Knitted Fabrics: User Perceptions and Everyday Use Experiments
CHI '22· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
Visuo-haptic Crossmodal Shape Perception Model for Shape-Changing Handheld Controllers Bridged by Inertial Tensor
CHI '23· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
FlexEar-Tips: Shape-Adjustable Ear Tips Using Pressure Control
CHI '25· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
Designing Touch Technologies for and with Bodies in Menstrual Discomfort
CHI '25· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
SqueezeMe: Creating Soft Inductive Pressure Sensors with Ferromagnetic Elastomers
CHI '25· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
Design and Perception of a Soft Shape Change Beneath a Smartwatch
MobileHCI '24· Haptic Wearables +1
- 100%
Skin-On Interfaces: A Bio-Driven Approach for Artificial Skin Design to Cover Interactive Devices
UIST '19· Haptic Wearables +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445137
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Haptic Wearables, Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers