Queuing for Waste: Sociotechnical Interactions within a Food Sharing Community

Community Engagement & Civic TechnologySustainable HCISocial WorkersGovernment Officials & Civil Servants

Document Title

Queuing for Waste: Sociotechnical Interactions within a Food Sharing Community

Document Information

  • Subject Area: Food sharing, sociotechnical interactions, human-computer interaction design
  • Keywords: food sharing, community-led initiatives, public affairs, user-centered design, environmental sustainability

Research Background and Issues

  • Identified Problems or Challenges:

    • The current societal issues of food waste and imbalance in the food supply chain have led to environmental, social, and economic problems such as food poverty and resource wastage.
    • Food sharing organizations face practical challenges in managing and operating, such as ensuring equitable food distribution and handling participant flow during large events.
    • The role and challenges of technology in facilitating food sharing have not been fully explored.
  • Significance:

    • Food waste is a global issue closely linked to environmental sustainability and social equity.
    • Food sharing activities serve as a complementary solution to mainstream food distribution systems, raising public awareness of food waste and promoting behavioral change.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work:

    • The motivation is to reduce food waste while increasing public awareness of the flaws in the current food supply chain.
    • Unlike digitally-driven food sharing models (e.g., Too Good To Go, Olio), this study focuses on face-to-face sociotechnical interactions in food sharing.
    • Existing research in the food and HCI fields has begun exploring how technology can support more socially interactive and sustainable food practices.

Solution

  • Methods or Solutions:

    • Conducted ethnographic research on a community-led food sharing organization in Denmark—Foodsharing Copenhagen (FS-CPH).
    • Explored how volunteers transform surplus food from a commodity into a gift and manage event participants through queuing mechanisms.
  • Innovations:

    • Integrated face-to-face interactions and community values (e.g., collective care, equitable distribution) into the design and management of food sharing activities.
    • Proposed how sociotechnical design can promote community economies and reimagine food distribution models.
  • Implementation Steps and Techniques:

    • Data Collection: Recorded the perspectives and actions of volunteers and participants through interviews, participant observation, and workshops.
    • Data Analysis: Used thematic analysis to summarize the community's core values, operational mechanisms, and the evolution of queuing systems.
    • Experimented with three queuing mechanisms: first-come-first-served online systems, random numbering systems, and image-based grouping systems, exploring possibilities for equitable distribution and conflict reduction.
    • Reflected on the impact of technological interventions, such as how digital queuing tickets might disrupt social interactions within the community.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Outcomes:

    • Identified three queuing systems and their pros and cons:
      • The first-come-first-served mechanism faced challenges due to a lack of fairness.
      • The random numbering system alleviated some fairness issues but caused confusion and dissatisfaction among participants.
      • The image-based grouping system improved fairness and helped reduce congestion during large events but still faced issues like cheating.
    • Defined the process of transforming food from a commodity to a gift and how this transformation is achieved through volunteer labor and organization.
  • Comparative Advantages over Existing Solutions:

    • Compared to digitally-driven sharing models, FS-CPH activities emphasize face-to-face interaction and community collective consciousness.
    • Contributes to environmental sustainability goals, such as reducing food waste and enhancing public awareness of its impacts.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:

    • Interactions between participants and volunteers during large events were deemed key to advancing food sharing goals.
    • The efficiency and social impact of different queuing systems were systematically evaluated.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Limitations: The current study primarily focuses on the perspective of volunteers rather than ordinary participants and has not fully explored the potential negative impacts of technological interventions on the social dynamics of queuing.
    • Future Directions:
      • Investigate how digital technology can optimize queuing mechanisms without undermining core community values.
      • Strengthen bidirectional interactions between participants and volunteers, ensuring that technological designs reflect the core principles of community economies.
      • Expand research to different types of food sharing communities to validate the logical feasibility.

The above summary is based on the content provided in the PDF document.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/47486/2021

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445059
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Community Engagement & Civic Technology, Sustainable HCI
work
Professions
Social Workers, Government Officials & Civil Servants
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers