Community Supported Agriculture: The Concept of Solidarity in Mitigating Between Harvests and Needs
Authors
Sustainable HCIEcological Design & Green ComputingFarmers & Agricultural Workers (especially in Developing Countries)Environmental Advocates
Document Title
Community Supported Agriculture: The Concept of Solidarity in Mitigating Between Harvests and Needs
Document Information
- Subject Areas: Sustainable Agriculture, Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
- Keywords: Solidarity Agriculture, Sustainable HCI, Currency Innovation, Trust, Distributed Ledger Technology, Collaborative Work, Food Sovereignty, Technological Sovereignty, Spreadsheet Order System
Research Background and Problems
- Problems or Challenges:
- Current production and consumption models exhibit socially and ecologically destructive externalities, particularly evident in global supply chains.
- Challenges faced by Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): the need to transcend traditional market mechanisms for fairer resource allocation; how to reconcile consumer demands with constraints of local agricultural production.
- Lack of innovation in collaboration mechanisms within and between CSA communities, especially in resource sharing and exchange.
- Significance:
- Covid-19 exposed the vulnerabilities of global food production and exchange systems, emphasizing the importance of localized, resilient, and quality-driven food production.
- CSA aims to provide an alternative to address inequities and unsustainable practices in traditional food systems.
- Research Motivation and Related Work:
- The study seeks to explore the role of solidarity principles in mediating consumer demands and agricultural outputs, and further investigate how currency mechanisms can support internal demand coordination and external collaboration within CSA.
- Reports limitations in existing research, particularly the insufficient attention to CSA and currency interactions within the sustainable HCI domain.
Solutions
- Main Methods or Solutions:
- Through participatory observation research, using Germany's Luzernenhof CSA as a case study, analyzing the operational principles of solidarity.
- Luzernenhof employs a Google Spreadsheet-based order and distribution system, along with a self-created "Luzerne" currency unit representing order quantities, to offer consumers customized product orders on demand.
- Innovations:
- Introduced a "non-market" exclusive currency (Luzerne) to avoid traditional market price interference in value distribution, encouraging consumers to shift from a "shopping mindset" to a "community cooperation" perspective.
- Achieved a higher trust-based allocation mechanism within the CSA community, allowing consumers to flexibly customize order quantities, forming an "unlimited share size" operational model.
- Supported high-trust relationships between consumers and farms through non-mandatory recommended payment amounts to ensure system sustainability.
- Implementation Steps and Technologies:
- Order management is conducted through Google Spreadsheets: farms adjust product availability and pricing based on inventory and demand.
- Regularly provide payment recommendations to farm members, who decide final payment amounts based on Luzerne order records.
- Qualitative discussions on the introduction of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) to explore broader collaboration potential among CSA networks.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Outcomes:
- Defined and distinguished three key characteristics of the Luzernenhof model: free product selection, unlimited share size, independent pricing system (Luzerne).
- The system alleviated the traditional CSA issue of insufficient responsiveness to consumer demands in resource allocation while maintaining ecosystem stability.
- The introduction of Luzerne currency eliminated potential unfair payment behaviors among members, enhancing community trust and participation.
- Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Compared to traditional "equal shared benefits" CSA models, Luzernenhof's solution improved members' freedom of choice and resource utilization.
- Reduced market competition-induced inequalities through a cashless, non-market currency system.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Field observations of Luzernenhof's system revealed high adherence to recommended payment amounts among members, with no "free-rider" behaviors observed.
- The system demonstrated significant resilience during Covid-19, particularly in situations of resource shortages or logistical constraints.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- The current system heavily relies on Google's technical support; service disruptions pose high risks.
- Trust challenges exist when expanding cooperative networks (e.g., resource allocation and exchange among multiple CSAs), requiring a balance between fairness and efficiency.
- Future research directions include developing cross-community collaboration software, exploring solutions based on Distributed Ledger Technology, and continuing to study the relationship between currency innovation and community building.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How does community-supported agriculture (CSA) coordinate consumer demand and agricultural output through solidarity mechanisms?Category: Participatory Design and Community Equity GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- In CSA communities, can non-market currencies (e.g., Luzerne) improve fairness and resource utilization efficiency?Category: Participatory Design and Community Equity GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can distributed ledger technology support resource sharing and collaboration among CSA communities?Category: Participatory Design and Community Equity GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Traditional agricultural supply chains struggle to achieve fair, flexible resource allocation aligned with consumer demand.Category: Participatory Design and Community Equity GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
Evaluating Sustainable Interaction Design of Digital Services: The Case of YouTube
CHI '19· Sustainable HCI +1
- 75%
Hitting the Triple Bottom Line: Widening the HCI Approach to Sustainability
CHI '22· Sustainable HCI +1
- 67%
"Can the rest of the world have flush toilets? No. Composting toilets? Yes!": Mediating the Human-Nature Relations by Composting Toilets
C&C '25· Sustainable HCI +2
- 60%
This Changes Sustainable HCI
CHI '18· Sustainable HCI +1
- 60%
The Breaking Hand: Skills, Care, and Sufferings of the Hands of an Electronic Waste Worker in Bangladesh
CHI '19· Developing Countries & HCI for Development (HCI4D) +2
- 60%
Have We Taken On Too Much?: A Critical Review of the Sustainable HCI Landscape
CHI '22· Sustainable HCI +1
- 60%
Exploring Assumptions about Sustainability: Towards a Constructive Framework for Action in Sustainable HCI
CHI '25· Sustainable HCI +1
- 60%
Designing for Digital Environmental Stewardship in Waste Management
DIS '23· Sustainable HCI +1
- 60%
Systemic Sustainable HCI: Integrating Collaborative Modeling into a Design Process to Address Rebound Effects
DIS '24· Sustainable HCI +1
- 60%
Understanding the Initial Journey of UX Designers Toward Sustainable Interaction Design: A Focus on Digital Infrastructure Energy Reduction
DIS '24· Sustainable HCI +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445268
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Sustainable HCI, Ecological Design & Green Computing
work
Professions
Farmers & Agricultural Workers (especially in Developing Countries), Environmental Advocates
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers