Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?
Authors
The potential for machine learning (ML) systems to amplify social inequities and unfairness is receiving increasing popular and academic attention. A surge of recent work has focused on the development of algorithmic tools to assess and mitigate such unfairness. If these tools are to have a positive impact on industry practice, however, it is crucial that their design be informed by an understanding of real-world needs. Through 35 semi-structured interviews and an anonymous survey of 267 ML practitioners, we conduct the first systematic investigation of commercial product teams' challenges and needs for support in developing fairer ML systems. We identify areas of alignment and disconnect between the challenges faced by teams in practice and the solutions proposed in the fair ML research literature. Based on these findings, we highlight directions for future ML and HCI research that will better address practitioners' needs.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
The Effect of Gender De-biased Recommendations – A User Study on Gender-specific Preferences
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 80%
The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness Toolkits
CHI '21· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 71%
"Because AI is 100% right and safe": User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in India
CHI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 67%
Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needs
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
AI is Entering Regulated Territory: Understanding the Supervisors' Perspective for Model Justifiability in Financial Crime Detection
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Incremental XAI: Memorable Understanding of AI with Incremental Explanations
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Towards a Non-Ideal Methodological Framework for Responsible ML
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 67%
User-Driven Value Alignment: Understanding Users' Perceptions and Strategies for Addressing Biased and Discriminatory Statements in AI Companions
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 60%
Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People's Reactions to Algorithmic Harm
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 60%
Designing Interactive Explainable AI Tools for Algorithmic Literacy and Transparency
DIS '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)