Evaluating HCI Research beyond Usability

Mental Health Apps & Online Support CommunitiesComputational Methods in HCIHCI ResearchersCognitive Scientists

Evaluating research artefacts is an important step to showcase the validity of a chosen approach. The CHI community has developed and agreed upon a large variety of evaluation methods for HCI research; however, sometimes those methods are not applicable or not sufficient. This is especially the case when the contribution lies within the context of the application area, such as for research in sustainable HCI, HCI for development, or design fiction and futures studies. In this SIG, we invite the CHI community to share their insights from projects that encountered problems in evaluating research and aim to discuss solutions for this difficult topic. We invite researchers from all areas of HCI research who are interested to engage in a debate of issues in the process of validating research artefacts.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/3318/2018

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2018
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Mental Health Apps & Online Support Communities, Computational Methods in HCI
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Cognitive Scientists
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers