PIP Kit: An Exploratory Investigation into using Lifelogging to support Disability Benefit Claimants
Authors
Disability assessment processes are complex and stressful, with claimants finding it challenging to prepare an effective account of their disabilities to support their claim. This project focuses on a disability benefit called Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is received by millions of people with disabilities in the UK. We present a multi-stage exploratory investigation into how lifelogging could help address the challenges claimants have in accessing disability benefits. In the first study, benefit advisors participated in interviews and workshops to inform the design of PIP Kit, a highly customisable prototype elicitation diary to help disability claimants articulate their experiences. In the second study, PIP Kit was trialled by benefit claimants whilst making their actual PIP claims. We found that PIP Kit helped empower claimants in understanding the claim process and assisted in building arguments for their claims. We also have identified clear principles for supporting disability benefit claimants with technological interventions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
"I Choose Assistive Devices That Save My Face" A Study on Perceptions of Accessibility and Assistive Technology Use Conducted in China
CHI '21· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +2
- 67%
Perceiving Affordances Differently: The Unintended Consequences When Young Autistic Adults Engage with Social Media
CHI '22· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +1
- 67%
“I feel like he’s looking in the computer world to be social, but I can’t trust his judgement”: Reimagining Parental Control for Children with ASD
CHI '24· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +1
- 63%
12 Ways to Empower: Designing for Children's Digital Autonomy
CHI '23· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)