Defining Haptic Experience: Foundations for Understanding, Communicating, and Evaluating HX
Honorable MentionHaptic technology is maturing, with expectations and evidence that it will contribute to user experience (UX). However, we have very little understanding about how haptic technology can influence people's experience. Researchers and designers need a way to understand, communicate, and evaluate haptic technology's effect on UX. From a literature review and two studies – one with haptics novices, the other with expert hapticians – we developed a theoretical model of the factors that constitute a good haptic experience (HX). We define HX and propose its constituent factors: design parameters of Timeliness, Density, Intensity, and Timbre; the cross-cutting concern of Personalization; usability requirements of Utility, Causality, Consistency, and Saliency; and experiential factors of Harmony, Expressivity, Autotelics, Immersion, and Realism as guiding constructs important for haptic experience. This model will help guide design and research of haptic systems, inform language around haptics, and provide the basis for evaluative instruments, such as checklists, heuristics, or questionnaires.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
Does It Matter Which Finger You Use? Investigating Finger Identity and Haptic Pattern Recognition for Stationary and Moving Fingers
CHI '26· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +2
- 60%
An Explanation of Fitts' Law-like Performance in Gaze-Based Selection Tasks Using a Psychophysics Approach
CHI '19· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction
- 60%
Exploring Recognition Accuracy of Vibrotactile Stimuli in Sternoclavicular Area
UbiComp '23· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)