AI-enabled smart-home agents that automate household routines are increasingly viable, but the design space of how and what such systems should communicate with their users remains underexplored. Through a user-enactment study, we identified various interpretations of and feelings toward such a system's confidence in its automated acts. That confidence and their own mental models influenced what and how the participants wanted the system to communicate, as well as how they would assess, diagnose, and subsequently improve it. Automated acts resulted from false predictions were not generally considered improper, provided that they were perceived as reasonable or potentially useful. The participants' improvement strategies were of four general types, all of which will be discussed. Factors affecting their preferred levels of involvement in automated acts and their interest in system confidence were also identified. We conclude by making practical design recommendations for the user-system communication design spaces of smart-home routine assistants.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/32046/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376501
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
8 authors
sell
Subtopics
Smart Home Interaction Design, Smart Home Privacy & Security
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
8 related papers