Checklist Design Reconsidered: Understanding Checklist Compliance and Timing of Interactions

User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)Prototyping & User TestingPhysicians, Nurses & CliniciansSurgeons (Surgical Assistance Systems)

We examine the association between user interactions with a checklist and task performance in a time-critical medical setting. By comparing 98 logs from a digital checklist for trauma resuscitation with activity logs generated by video review, we identified three non-compliant checklist use behaviors: failure to check items for completed tasks, falsely checking items when tasks were not performed, and inaccurately checking items for incomplete tasks. Using video review, we found that user perceptions of task completion were often misaligned with clinical practices that guided activity coding, thereby contributing to non-compliant check-offs. Our analysis of associations between different contexts and the timing of check-offs showed longer delays when (1) checklist users were absent during patient arrival, (2) patients had penetrating injuries, and (3) resuscitations were assigned to the highest acuity. We discuss opportunities for reconsidering checklist designs to reduce non-compliant checklist use.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/31753/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376853
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation), Prototyping & User Testing
work
Professions
Physicians, Nurses & Clinicians, Surgeons (Surgical Assistance Systems)
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers