Increasing Input Accuracy of Embodied Devices via Electrical Muscle Stimulation

Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS)Hand Gesture RecognitionForce Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic WeightHCI ResearchersAI/ML Researchers & Engineers

Paper Title

Increasing Input Accuracy of Embodied Devices via Electrical Muscle Stimulation

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Enhancing input accuracy in embodied devices using electrical muscle stimulation (EMS).
  • Keywords: Embodied devices, electrical muscle stimulation, input accuracy, proprioception, interaction techniques, recall, confirmation, constraints, user study, gestural input.

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Embodied devices, which rely on the user's body for input and output, lack effective techniques to align users' proprioceptive inputs with the interface state, leading to inaccuracies and usability challenges.
  • Significance: Improving input accuracy in embodied devices is critical for enabling reliable, eyes-free interaction in mobile or demanding contexts, such as walking or multitasking.
  • Motivation and related work: Prior research explored EMS for proprioceptive feedback but did not formalize or evaluate techniques to improve input accuracy. Existing methods often conflict with users' movements or distract from tasks, leaving a gap in usability enhancements for embodied devices.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: Three interaction techniques—recall, confirmation, and constraints—are introduced to improve input accuracy in embodied devices by leveraging EMS for proprioceptive feedback.
  • Novelty:
    1. Systematic definition and evaluation of EMS-based interaction techniques for embodied devices.
    2. Demonstration of significant improvements in input accuracy and user confidence through a user study.
    3. Application of Nielsen’s usability heuristics (e.g., visibility of system status, error prevention) to proprioceptive interfaces.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Recall: Aligns the user's limb with the interface state upon invocation by actuating the limb to the correct position.
    • Confirmation: Provides proprioceptive cues (e.g., detents) to signal valid state transitions during input.
    • Constraints: Physically bounds user inputs to valid ranges, preventing errors and signaling limits.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Input accuracy improved by 40.91% (mean error reduced from 34.61° to 20.45°) in the combined condition compared to the baseline.
    • User confidence increased by 53.85% (mean Likert rating rose from 3.25 to 5.00) in the combined condition.
    • Recall alone significantly improved accuracy for the first target after distraction (mean error reduced to 9.82° vs. 19.60° baseline).
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • Combined techniques outperformed individual techniques and the baseline in accuracy and confidence.
    • Recall and confirmation were particularly effective in aiding users' mental models and reducing cognitive load.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • A user study with 12 participants tested five conditions (baseline, recall-only, confirmation-only, constraints-only, combined) using a wrist-based slider.
    • Metrics included absolute and relative input accuracy, confidence ratings, and qualitative feedback.
    • A technical evaluation confirmed the EMS system's accuracy (mean error: 4.83°) and reliability.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Study conducted in a stationary lab setting, limiting generalizability to mobile contexts.
    • Focused on slider-type devices; future work should explore other embodied device types (e.g., buttons, knobs).
    • EMS accuracy constraints (4.83° error) may limit precision in some applications.

Summary

This paper introduces and evaluates three EMS-based interaction techniques—recall, confirmation, and constraints—to improve input accuracy in embodied devices. A user study demonstrated that combining these techniques significantly enhanced accuracy (40.91% improvement) and confidence (53.85% increase) compared to baseline proprioceptive input. While the study focused on a wrist-based slider, the findings suggest broader applicability to other embodied device types and contexts. Future work should explore these techniques in mobile settings and with diverse device designs.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/223457/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791134
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS), Hand Gesture Recognition, Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, AI/ML Researchers & Engineers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers