I Participate, Therefore We Benefit: Ubuntu as a Relational Compass for Ethical Compensation in HCI

Technology Ethics & Critical HCIDeveloping Countries & HCI for Development (HCI4D)Empowerment of Marginalized GroupsHCI ResearchersSociologists & AnthropologistsSocial Workers

Paper Title

I Participate, Therefore We Benefit: Ubuntu as a Relational Compass for Ethical Compensation in HCI

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Ethical compensation frameworks in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research with low-income communities.
  • Keywords: Ubuntu, ethical compensation, relational accountability, decolonial HCI, community-centered research, restorative justice, participatory design, Global South, power dynamics, research economy.

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Current compensation practices in HCI research often perpetuate neocolonial extraction, commodify participation, and create dependency, failing to address structural inequities and relational accountability.
  • Significance: Ethical compensation is critical for ensuring dignity, sovereignty, and justice in research engagements with marginalized communities, especially in low-income contexts.
  • Motivation and related work: While bioethics and ICTD/ICT4D research have critiqued compensation practices, HCI-specific challenges—such as iterative design cycles, artifact creation, and institutional grant structures—remain underexplored. Existing frameworks often prioritize transactional models, neglecting relational and restorative approaches informed by decolonial perspectives.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: A relational compensation framework inspired by Ubuntu, emphasizing restorative justice, mutual accountability, and communal benefit over transactional exchanges.
  • Novelty:
    1. Critique of coloniality in HCI compensation practices, identifying exploitative dynamics and dependency risks.
    2. Operationalization of Ubuntu and decolonial philosophy into actionable principles for ethical research economies.
    3. Generative principles for relational compensation, addressing tensions and fostering long-term, reciprocal partnerships.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Collective autoethnography to reflect on researcher experiences and positionality.
    • Analytic vignettes from four community-based research projects in Africa to examine compensation dilemmas.
    • Development of a 10-principle framework for ethical compensation, addressing researcher practices, institutional structures, and community engagement norms.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Compensation models rooted in transactional logic often replicate exploitative dynamics, creating a "research gig economy."
    • Ubuntu-inspired approaches reframe compensation as mutual accountability and relational care, prioritizing communal benefit and long-term partnerships.
    • Practical principles include unconditional payment, co-designed compensation terms, and community-directed investments.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • Moves beyond transactional models to relational frameworks that honor community sovereignty and reduce dependency.
    • Addresses systemic inequities by integrating decolonial perspectives and fostering shared ownership of research outcomes.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Reflexive analysis of vignettes from four African communities (Ocean View, Sweetwaters, Ga-Dikgale, Nyire).
    • Application of principles across diverse HCI contexts, including workshops, long-term co-design, and technology trials.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Framework implementation requires additional labor and institutional support, posing challenges for early-career researchers.
    • Future work should center participant voices to evaluate the dignity and reciprocity fostered by Ubuntu-informed principles.

Summary

This paper critiques transactional compensation models in HCI research, arguing that they perpetuate coloniality and dependency. It proposes a relational framework inspired by Ubuntu, emphasizing restorative justice, mutual accountability, and communal benefit. Through analytic vignettes and a 10-principle framework, the authors provide actionable guidelines for researchers, institutions, and the HCI community to adopt ethical compensation practices. By reimagining compensation as a relational exchange, this work aims to foster long-term, equitable partnerships and transform HCI research economies.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/223432/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791981
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
9 authors
sell
Subtopics
Technology Ethics & Critical HCI, Developing Countries & HCI for Development (HCI4D), Empowerment of Marginalized Groups
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Sociologists & Anthropologists, Social Workers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
6 related papers