I Participate, Therefore We Benefit: Ubuntu as a Relational Compass for Ethical Compensation in HCI
Authors
Paper Title
I Participate, Therefore We Benefit: Ubuntu as a Relational Compass for Ethical Compensation in HCI
Publication Info
- Topic area: Ethical compensation frameworks in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research with low-income communities.
- Keywords: Ubuntu, ethical compensation, relational accountability, decolonial HCI, community-centered research, restorative justice, participatory design, Global South, power dynamics, research economy.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Current compensation practices in HCI research often perpetuate neocolonial extraction, commodify participation, and create dependency, failing to address structural inequities and relational accountability.
- Significance: Ethical compensation is critical for ensuring dignity, sovereignty, and justice in research engagements with marginalized communities, especially in low-income contexts.
- Motivation and related work: While bioethics and ICTD/ICT4D research have critiqued compensation practices, HCI-specific challenges—such as iterative design cycles, artifact creation, and institutional grant structures—remain underexplored. Existing frameworks often prioritize transactional models, neglecting relational and restorative approaches informed by decolonial perspectives.
Solution
- Proposed approach: A relational compensation framework inspired by Ubuntu, emphasizing restorative justice, mutual accountability, and communal benefit over transactional exchanges.
- Novelty:
- Critique of coloniality in HCI compensation practices, identifying exploitative dynamics and dependency risks.
- Operationalization of Ubuntu and decolonial philosophy into actionable principles for ethical research economies.
- Generative principles for relational compensation, addressing tensions and fostering long-term, reciprocal partnerships.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Collective autoethnography to reflect on researcher experiences and positionality.
- Analytic vignettes from four community-based research projects in Africa to examine compensation dilemmas.
- Development of a 10-principle framework for ethical compensation, addressing researcher practices, institutional structures, and community engagement norms.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- Compensation models rooted in transactional logic often replicate exploitative dynamics, creating a "research gig economy."
- Ubuntu-inspired approaches reframe compensation as mutual accountability and relational care, prioritizing communal benefit and long-term partnerships.
- Practical principles include unconditional payment, co-designed compensation terms, and community-directed investments.
- Advantage over baselines:
- Moves beyond transactional models to relational frameworks that honor community sovereignty and reduce dependency.
- Addresses systemic inequities by integrating decolonial perspectives and fostering shared ownership of research outcomes.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Reflexive analysis of vignettes from four African communities (Ocean View, Sweetwaters, Ga-Dikgale, Nyire).
- Application of principles across diverse HCI contexts, including workshops, long-term co-design, and technology trials.
- Limitations and future work:
- Framework implementation requires additional labor and institutional support, posing challenges for early-career researchers.
- Future work should center participant voices to evaluate the dignity and reciprocity fostered by Ubuntu-informed principles.
Summary
This paper critiques transactional compensation models in HCI research, arguing that they perpetuate coloniality and dependency. It proposes a relational framework inspired by Ubuntu, emphasizing restorative justice, mutual accountability, and communal benefit. Through analytic vignettes and a 10-principle framework, the authors provide actionable guidelines for researchers, institutions, and the HCI community to adopt ethical compensation practices. By reimagining compensation as a relational exchange, this work aims to foster long-term, equitable partnerships and transform HCI research economies.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 71%
Black 👩🏽💻 to the Future - The Power of Designing Afrofuturist Technology with Black Women, Femmes, and Non-Binary People
DIS '24· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +2
- 67%
Defining Through Expansion: Conducting Asynchronous Remote Communities (ARC) Research with Stigmatized Groups
CHI '18· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 67%
Empowerment in HCI - A Survey and Framework
CHI '18· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 67%
UnWEIRDing Peer Review in Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '26· Developing Countries & HCI for Development (HCI4D) +1
- 67%
Wall, An Eccentric Design Probe: Exploring and Exposing the Sense-and-Extract Paradigm
DIS '25· Technology Ethics & Critical HCI +1
- 63%
"For Us By Us": Intentionally Designing Technology for Lived Black Experiences
DIS '24· Inclusive Design +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)