Less is More! Visual Suppression for Bottom-up and Top-down Attention in Dynamic Environments
Authors
Paper Title
Less is More! Visual Suppression for Bottom-up and Top-down Attention in Dynamic Environments
Publication Info
- Topic area: Visual attention mechanisms in dynamic virtual environments
- Keywords: Visual suppression, salience-relevance, attention redistribution, dimming, blurring, virtual environments, cognitive load, visual search, sustained monitoring, immersive systems
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Dynamic virtual environments create visual competition between salient and relevant objects, impairing user attention. Existing methods to enhance salience introduce visual clutter and fail to address salience-relevance interactions comprehensively.
- Significance: Effective attention management in virtual environments is critical for applications like training, navigation, and monitoring, where distractions can compromise performance and safety.
- Motivation and related work: Prior research has focused on enhancing relevant object salience or suppressing irrelevant distractions but has not systematically explored salience-relevance interactions or the effects of suppression intensity. This paper addresses these gaps by introducing suppression-based visual filters.
Solution
- Proposed approach: Suppression-based visual filtering mechanisms, implemented as Dim (brightness modulation) and Blur (foveated depth-of-field blur), at Strong and Weak intensity levels.
- Novelty:
- Development of validated suppression-based visual filters across different intensities in dynamic virtual environments.
- Empirical evidence from user studies showing the effects of filters on attention performance.
- Introduction of the Attention Redistribution Principle, explaining how suppressed irrelevant salience reallocates attentional resources.
- Systematic exploration of salience-relevance interactions and their impact on attention.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- External object attribute modulation (Dim): Reduces brightness of irrelevant objects to create feature contrast.
- Internal vision simulation (Blur): Mimics human visual acuity fall-off using Gaussian blur centered on the target.
- Controlled virtual environment with abstract moving objects to manipulate salience-relevance configurations.
- Evaluation through visual search and sustained monitoring tasks using metrics like response time, accuracy, and cognitive load.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- Dim-Strong achieved the fastest response time (6.59s) and highest accuracy (99.2%) in visual search tasks.
- Blur conditions improved accuracy but slowed response times during sustained monitoring.
- Strong intensity outperformed Weak intensity across both Dim and Blur filters.
- Cognitive load reduced by up to 41.4% (Dim-Strong), while motion sickness effects were minimal.
- Advantage over baselines:
- All visual filters improved attention performance compared to Baseline, with Dim-Strong showing the most significant gains.
- Dim filters demonstrated faster response times and higher accuracy than Blur filters.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Within-subjects study with 38 participants, testing five conditions (Dim-Strong, Dim-Weak, Blur-Strong, Blur-Weak, Baseline) across nine salience-relevance configurations.
- Metrics included response time, accuracy, distance perception, eye gaze angle, discriminability (d′), and response criterion (C).
- Limitations and future work:
- Limited ecological validity due to abstract virtual environment design.
- Salience defined solely by spatial distance, ignoring multi-feature interactions.
- Need for systematic validation of intensity levels and salience differences.
- Open questions on intermediate intensities, dynamic relevance changes, and unexpected relevant information.
Summary
This study introduced suppression-based visual filters (Dim and Blur) to manage attention in dynamic virtual environments. Dim-Strong demonstrated superior performance in visual search and monitoring tasks, validating the Attention Redistribution Principle, which explains how suppressing irrelevant salience reallocates attentional resources to relevant information. Findings revealed salience-relevance challenges and offered design insights for immersive systems, such as driving displays and monitoring tools. While the abstract experimental setup limits direct real-world application, the results provide a foundation for future research and practical implementations in complex environments.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality: Analysis of Typing Performance and Effects of Avatar Hands
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 80%
FocusFlow: 3D Gaze-Depth Interaction in Virtual Reality Leveraging Active Visual Depth Manipulation
CHI '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 80%
DEEP: 3D Gaze Pointing in Virtual Reality Leveraging Eyelid Movement
UIST '22· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Searching Through Complex Worlds: Visual Search and Spatial Regularity Memory in Mixed Reality
CHI '26· Immersion & Presence Research +2
- 67%
The Eye–Head Mover Spectrum: Modelling Individual and Population Head Movement Tendencies in Virtual Reality
CHI '26· Immersion & Presence Research +2
- 67%
Detecting Input Recognition Errors and User Errors Using Gaze Dynamics in Virtual Reality
UIST '22· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
- 60%
An Explanation of Fitts' Law-like Performance in Gaze-Based Selection Tasks Using a Psychophysics Approach
CHI '19· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction
- 60%
RetroSketch: A Retrospective Method for Measuring Emotions and Presence in Virtual Reality
CHI '25· Immersion & Presence Research
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)