"I don't want to break it": An Exploration of Perceived Fragility in Shape-Changing Interfaces

Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic MaterialsForce Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic WeightPrototyping & User TestingProduct DesignersHCI Researchers

Paper Title

"I don't want to break it": An Exploration of Perceived Fragility in Shape-Changing Interfaces

Publication Info

  • Topic area: User perceptions of fragility in shape-changing interfaces (SCIs) and its impact on interaction.
  • Keywords: Shape-changing interfaces, perceived fragility, user interaction, material properties, dynamic affordances, interaction design, user behavior, contextual factors, system robustness, HCI.

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Users often perceive shape-changing interfaces (SCIs) as fragile due to their dynamic and novel nature, which can discourage exploration and interaction. Existing research lacks a detailed understanding of how perceived fragility affects user behavior and how to design SCIs to mitigate these concerns.
  • Significance: Addressing perceived fragility is critical for improving user confidence, interaction discoverability, and the adoption of SCIs in practical applications.
  • Motivation and related work: Prior studies have explored physical fragility and dynamic affordances in SCIs but have not systematically examined perceived fragility. This paper builds on work in material perception, interaction affordances, and user behavior to fill this gap.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: A two-study investigation into perceived fragility in SCIs, including a theoretical analysis of video stimuli and a practical study with physical prototypes.
  • Novelty:
    1. Development of a comprehensive framework for factors influencing perceived fragility in SCIs, categorized into system, environmental, and user factors.
    2. Empirical validation of the framework through qualitative and quantitative user studies.
    3. Exploration of how material, composition, movement, and demonstrated handling affect fragility perceptions and interaction strategies.
    4. Identification of design strategies to manage fragility perceptions and encourage user engagement.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    1. Study 1: Participants (N=18) ranked 20 SCIs from video stimuli along a fragility spectrum, followed by thematic analysis to identify key factors influencing perceived fragility.
    2. Study 2: Participants (N=36) interacted with fabricated SCIs (Infinity Cubes and Folding Cubes) varying in material, composition, movement, and demonstrated handling. Interaction behaviors and fragility perceptions were analyzed through video recordings and post-interaction surveys.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Material was the most influential factor in perceived fragility, with rigid materials (e.g., metal, wood) seen as more robust than flexible ones (e.g., paper, silicone).
    • Movement and composition influenced interaction behaviors but had less direct impact on fragility ratings.
    • Demonstrated handling (e.g., rough vs. gentle placement) had limited effects in physical interaction contexts.
    • Perceived fragility did not deter interaction but shaped cautious and exploratory behaviors.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • The study provides a structured framework for understanding fragility perceptions, which was previously unaddressed in SCI research.
    • It highlights the interplay of physical, contextual, and user factors in shaping interaction strategies.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Study 1: Qualitative analysis of video-based fragility rankings and thematic coding of participant reasoning.
    • Study 2: Quantitative analysis of fragility ratings and rankings, combined with behavioral coding of interactions with physical prototypes.
    • Metrics included fragility ratings (7-point Likert scale), rankings, and interaction behaviors (e.g., hesitation, manipulation strategies).
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Limited exploration of all identified factors in physical interactions due to experimental constraints.
    • Potential influence of study context on participant behavior, reducing generalizability to real-world settings.
    • Future work should validate the framework across diverse SCIs, examine additional perceptual factors, and explore the interplay between fragility and other interaction affordances.

Summary

This paper investigates perceived fragility in shape-changing interfaces (SCIs) through two user studies, identifying material, composition, movement, and demonstrated handling as key factors. A comprehensive framework categorizes these factors into system, environmental, and user dimensions, providing actionable insights for SCI design. While perceived fragility shapes cautious and exploratory user behaviors, it does not deter interaction. The findings emphasize the importance of material choice, structural design, and interaction signifiers in managing fragility perceptions and enhancing user engagement. Future research should expand on these factors and explore their interplay with other perceptual and functional attributes of SCIs.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/223217/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3793422
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
9 authors
sell
Subtopics
Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials, Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight, Prototyping & User Testing
work
Professions
Product Designers, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
4 related papers