Investigating How Physical Surfaces Can Serve as Common-Region Cues for Perceptual Grouping of Virtual Elements in Augmented Reality
Honorable MentionAuthors
Paper Title
Investigating How Physical Surfaces Can Serve as Common-Region Cues for Perceptual Grouping of Virtual Elements in Augmented Reality
Publication Info
- Topic area: Perceptual grouping of virtual elements in augmented reality environments.
- Keywords: perceptual grouping, augmented reality, common region, physical surfaces, proximity cues, 3D interaction, user studies, virtual elements, spatial factors, AR system design.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: The role of physical surfaces as extrinsic grouping cues for virtual elements in augmented reality (AR) is not well understood, particularly in 3D environments where physical and virtual elements coexist.
- Significance: Understanding how physical contexts influence perceptual grouping can improve AR system design, enhance grouping clarity, and reduce ambiguities in user interpretation.
- Motivation and related work: Prior studies have explored intrinsic and extrinsic grouping principles (e.g., proximity, common region) in 2D and 3D contexts, but gaps remain in understanding how physical surfaces interact with virtual elements in AR. This paper builds on these principles to investigate the effects of physical surfaces as grouping cues in AR environments.
Solution
- Proposed approach: Two user studies were conducted to investigate how physical surfaces influence perceptual grouping of virtual elements in 3D and how these cues interact with intrinsic grouping principles like proximity in AR.
- Novelty:
- Systematic evaluation of physical surfaces as common-region cues in 3D using a repetition discrimination task in VR.
- Investigation of the interaction between extrinsic (common region) and intrinsic (proximity) grouping cues in AR environments.
- Design recommendations for AR systems to leverage physical environments for grouping tasks.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Study 1: Conducted in VR to examine how spatial properties of surfaces (direction, distance, size) influence grouping using a repetition discrimination task (N=24).
- Study 2: Conducted in a video see-through AR (VST-AR) environment to explore interactions between proximity and common-region cues under cooperative, interfering, and competitive conditions (N=24).
- Measurements included response time (RT), subjective ratings, and user behavior during grouping tasks.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- In Study 1, surfaces served as common-region cues, with grouping effects stronger for vertical surfaces aligned with the viewing direction and weaker for distant or oblique surfaces.
- In Study 2, conflicting proximity and common-region cues led to slower RTs and higher subjective difficulty ratings, indicating perceptual challenges.
- Participants adopted diverse strategies to resolve ambiguities, including leveraging physical boundaries, seeking clean backgrounds, and adjusting proximity cues.
- Advantage over baselines:
- Study 1 confirmed that spatial properties (e.g., surface direction, distance) significantly impact grouping in 3D.
- Study 2 demonstrated that AR systems must account for interactions between physical and virtual grouping cues to reduce ambiguity.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Study 1: 24 participants, 1008 trials per participant, controlled VR environment, analysis of RT and dwell time.
- Study 2: 24 participants, 84 trials per participant, VST-AR environment, analysis of RT, subjective ratings, and user behavior.
- Limitations and future work:
- Limited exploration of large distance variations and diverse physical surface types.
- Abstract tasks may restrict generalizability to real-world scenarios.
- Future work should investigate thresholds for effective grouping cues, interactions with other grouping principles, and more complex AR scenarios.
Summary
This paper investigates how physical surfaces act as common-region cues for perceptual grouping of virtual elements in AR. Two user studies reveal that spatial properties like surface direction and distance influence grouping in 3D, and that conflicting grouping cues (proximity vs. common region) create perceptual challenges in AR. Participants employed various strategies to resolve ambiguities, highlighting the need for AR systems to align physical and virtual grouping cues. The findings inform design recommendations for leveraging physical environments in AR to enhance grouping clarity and reduce user confusion.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Do It Fast, Forget It Fast: How Timing and Limb Visualizations Affect First-Person Augmented Reality Instructions
CHI '26· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 86%
Lost in Corridors: Modeling and Mitigating Spatial Disorientation by Sensing Environmental Characteristics and User Behavior
CHI '26· Immersion & Presence Research +3
- 71%
User Onboarding in Virtual Reality: An investigation of current practices
CHI '23· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 71%
Uncertain Pointer: Situated Feedforward Visualizations for Ambiguity-Aware AR Target Selection
CHI '26· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 71%
Can AR Embedded Visualizations Foster Appropriate Reliance on AI in Spatial Decision-Making? A Comparative Study of AR X-Ray vs. 2D Minimap
CHI '26· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 71%
PeriphAR: Fast and Accurate Real-World Object Selection with Peripheral Augmented Reality Displays
CHI '26· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 67%
ARchitect: Building Interactive Virtual Experiences from Physical Affordances by Bringing Human-in-the-Loop
CHI '20· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +1
- 67%
User-Aware Rendering: Merging the Strengths of Device- and User-Perspective Rendering in Handheld AR
MobileHCI '23· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +1
- 67%
Visual Noise Cancellation: Exploring Visual Discomfort and Opportunities for Vision Augmentations
MobileHCI '24· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +1
- 63%
Efficient Human-in-the-Loop Optimization via Priors Learned from User Models
CHI '26· Mid-Air Haptics (Ultrasonic) +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)