From Vulnerable to Resilient: Examining Parent and Teen Perceptions on How to Respond to Unwanted Cybergrooming Advances

Youth Online Safety & PrivacyDigital Parenting & Screen Time ManagementMental Health Technology for YouthChild Welfare WorkersDomestic Violence Support Workers

Paper Title

From Vulnerable to Resilient: Examining Parent and Teen Perceptions on How to Respond to Unwanted Cybergrooming Advances

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Teen online safety and cybergrooming prevention
  • Keywords: Cybergrooming, teen safety, online abuse, protective strategies, vulnerable behaviors, parent-teen perceptions, sociotechnical interventions, stage-based taxonomy, resilience, online risks

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Existing research on cybergrooming focuses predominantly on perpetrator detection using computational methods, leaving a gap in understanding how teens and parents perceive and respond to such advances. Current approaches often fail to address nuanced grooming processes or empower teens to proactively manage risks.
  • Significance: Cybergrooming poses severe mental, emotional, and physical risks to teens, including anxiety, depression, and exposure to sexual exploitation. Understanding teen-centered responses is critical for designing effective interventions and educational programs.
  • Motivation and related work: Prior work has developed machine learning and NLP-based tools for detecting perpetrator behaviors but often at the expense of teen privacy. Few studies address teen and parent perspectives on vulnerability and protection, leaving a gap in understanding how to empower teens to recognize and resist grooming attempts.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: Conduct a mixed-methods study to analyze parent and teen perceptions of vulnerable and protective responses to simulated cybergrooming scenarios.
  • Novelty:
    1. Identification of four vulnerable behaviors and four protective strategies based on teen and parent responses.
    2. Development of a stage-based taxonomy of protective strategies aligned with cybergrooming progression.
    3. Creation of a systematically labeled dataset of responses to cybergrooming scenarios.
    4. Insights into differences between parent and teen perceptions of vulnerability and protection.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Conducted an online survey with 74 participants (51 parents, 23 teens), who responded to 10 simulated cybergrooming scenarios.
    • Participants provided vulnerable and protective responses to each scenario and explained their reasoning.
    • Analyzed responses using thematic coding to identify recurring behaviors and strategies.
    • Examined variations in responses across cybergrooming stages and between parent and teen groups.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Identified four vulnerable behaviors: encouraging risk escalation (49%), accepting advances (36%), displaying vulnerability (21%), and negating risk concern (15%).
    • Identified four protective strategies: setting boundaries (70%), directly declining advances (56%), signaling risk awareness (35%), and leveraging avoidance techniques (16%).
    • Vulnerable behaviors and protective strategies followed an escalating progression aligned with cybergrooming stages.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • Provides a teen-centered perspective on cybergrooming, complementing perpetrator-focused detection methods.
    • Introduces nuanced protective strategies beyond simple refusals, emphasizing boundary regulation and situational awareness.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Survey design included 10 realistic scenarios based on authentic cybergrooming conversations.
    • Participants’ responses were analyzed across six stages of cybergrooming (e.g., friendship forming, exclusivity, sexual).
    • Statistical analysis (chi-square tests) revealed significant variations in responses across stages and participant groups.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Scenarios were hypothetical and may not fully capture real-world interactions.
    • Sample size limited the ability to analyze differences across teen age groups.
    • Future work should include child safety experts, use real-world data, and evaluate the effectiveness of protective strategies in controlled experiments.

Summary

This study explores how teens and parents perceive vulnerability and protection during cybergrooming encounters, identifying four types of vulnerable behaviors and protective strategies. Responses were analyzed across six stages of cybergrooming, revealing an escalating progression in both risky and resilient behaviors. The findings contribute a stage-based taxonomy of protective strategies and a labeled dataset, offering practical insights for educational and sociotechnical interventions. By shifting the focus from perpetrator detection to teen empowerment, this work provides a foundation for developing tools and programs that help teens recognize, resist, and redirect risky online interactions.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/223030/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790949
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
9 authors
sell
Subtopics
Youth Online Safety & Privacy, Digital Parenting & Screen Time Management, Mental Health Technology for Youth
work
Professions
Child Welfare Workers, Domestic Violence Support Workers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers