Usage Matters: The Role of Frequency, Duration, and Experience in Presence Formation in Social Virtual Reality
Authors
Paper Title
Usage Matters: The Role of Frequency, Duration, and Experience in Presence Formation in Social Virtual Reality
Publication Info
- Topic area: Behavioral predictors of presence in social virtual reality environments.
- Keywords: Social VR, presence, frequency, session duration, VR experience, spatial presence, social presence, self-presence, user behavior, immersive environments.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Existing research on presence in VR has primarily focused on technical features or short-term, controlled laboratory studies, leaving a gap in understanding how everyday usage behaviors influence presence in real-world social VR contexts.
- Significance: Understanding the behavioral predictors of presence can inform the design of more immersive and inclusive virtual environments, enhancing user satisfaction and outcomes in applications like education, therapy, and social connection.
- Motivation and related work: Prior studies have shown mixed results regarding the effects of usage frequency, session duration, and VR experience on presence. Most research has been conducted in artificial lab settings, which fail to capture the natural, voluntary, and long-term engagement patterns seen in social VR platforms like VRChat and Rec Room. This study aims to address these gaps by examining real-world usage behaviors.
Solution
- Proposed approach: The study investigates how usage intensity—measured as frequency, session duration, and years of VR experience—predicts overall presence and its spatial, social, and self-presence dimensions in social VR.
- Novelty:
- Provides large-scale, survey-based evidence linking behavioral usage patterns to presence across three core dimensions.
- Demonstrates that the effects of frequency and duration are consistent across gender and age, with no evidence of demographic moderation.
- Highlights interaction effects between usage variables, showing cumulative and synergistic impacts on presence.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Conducted an online survey with 295 active social VR users recruited via Prolific.
- Measured frequency of use, session duration, and years of VR experience alongside validated scales for spatial, social, and self-presence.
- Applied hierarchical multiple regression to assess main effects, interactions (e.g., frequency × duration), and demographic moderation (gender, age).
Results
- Concrete findings:
- Frequency (β = 0.201, p < 0.001) and session duration (β = 0.183, p < 0.001) were strong predictors of overall presence.
- Interaction effects (e.g., frequency × duration, β = 0.150, p < 0.001) revealed that frequent and prolonged usage synergistically amplifies presence.
- Years of VR experience had weaker or non-significant direct effects but interacted with frequency and duration to enhance presence.
- Advantage over baselines:
- Demonstrates that everyday, voluntary usage behaviors in social VR predict presence more robustly than historical familiarity with VR.
- Extends prior lab-based findings by showing cumulative effects of usage intensity in naturalistic settings.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Surveyed 295 users (72.9% male, 47.5% aged 25–34) with diverse VR usage patterns.
- Measured presence using validated subscales for spatial, social, and self-presence.
- Regression models explained significant variance in presence (R² = 0.117–0.139), with interaction terms adding incremental explanatory power.
- Limitations and future work:
- Sample skewed toward younger, male, and European users, limiting generalizability.
- Retrospective self-reports may be influenced by memory biases.
- Future studies should integrate behavioral logs, explore mediating factors (e.g., flow, social connection), and validate findings in more diverse populations.
Summary
This study explores how usage intensity—frequency, session duration, and years of VR experience—shapes the sense of presence in social VR environments. Results show that frequency and duration are robust predictors of presence across spatial, social, and self dimensions, with interaction effects amplifying these relationships. Gender and age did not moderate these effects, suggesting consistency across demographic groups. The findings highlight the importance of sustained and frequent engagement for fostering immersive experiences and offer design insights for creating inclusive virtual environments that adapt to user behaviors.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Out of Control: Effects of Multimodal Self-similarity on Embodiment During Autonomous Avatar Demonstrations in Virtual Reality
CHI '26· Immersion & Presence Research +2
- 100%
Capability at a Glance: Design Guidelines for Intuitive Avatars Communicating Augmented Actions in Virtual Reality
CHI '26· Identity & Avatars in XR +2
- 83%
Anticipation Without Acceleration: Benefits of Shared Gaze in Collocated Augmented Reality Collaboration
CHI '26· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 83%
Social, Spatial, and Self-Presence as Predictors of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction in Social VR
CHI '26· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 83%
A Design Space of Virtual Bodies: Their Types, Effects, and Theoretical Foundations
CHI '26· Identity & Avatars in XR +2
- 71%
From One World to Another: Interfaces for Efficiently Transitioning Between Virtual Environments
CHI '26· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 71%
When Hands Meet Physics in Virtual Reality: Effects of Interaction Fidelity on User Experience
CHI '26· Immersion & Presence Research +2
- 71%
Escape From Human: An Interview Study of Social VR Players Practicing Self-Expression Through Avatars that Self-Identify as “Non-Human”
CHI '26· Identity & Avatars in XR +2
- 71%
Digital Proxemics as Measures of Social Interaction in Hybrid XR
CHI '26· Social & Collaborative VR +2
- 71%
``It Feels Like I am Invited to Communicate'': Mediating Ad-Hoc Bystander-VR User Interruptions Through Proactive Proxies
CHI '26· Social & Collaborative VR +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)