CoNode: Visualizing Workflows for Knowledge Reuse and Recombination in Team–AI Collaborative Design
Authors
Paper Title
CoNode: Visualizing Workflows for Knowledge Reuse and Recombination in Team–AI Collaborative Design
Publication Info
- Topic area: Generative AI and collaborative design processes.
- Keywords: Generative AI, collaborative design, process knowledge, workflow visualization, industrial design, team–AI collaboration, semantic–visual reasoning, knowledge reuse, creative recombination, CoSense.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Early-stage industrial design generates fragile process knowledge (e.g., sketches, semantic tags) that is rarely captured or reused systematically. Existing AI tools focus on generating outputs but fail to preserve, trace, or recombine design reasoning, leading to fragmented artifacts, context loss, and inefficient collaboration.
- Significance: Addressing these challenges is critical for improving design quality, enabling shared understanding, and enhancing team efficiency in industrial design workflows.
- Motivation and related work: Prior research highlights generative AI's role in expanding design spaces and supporting cross-modal exploration but lacks mechanisms for preserving and reusing process knowledge. Existing tools often focus on linear interactions and outcome generation, leaving gaps in traceability and multi-round collaboration.
Solution
- Proposed approach: CoNode—a two-layer system that embeds generative AI nodes into a shared whiteboard and structures design reasoning through triplet workflows. It includes the CoSense module for proactive knowledge consolidation, reuse, and recombination.
- Novelty:
- Embedding generative AI nodes directly into a shared whiteboard for seamless semantic and visual exploration.
- Structuring fragmented design reasoning as traceable triplet workflows (input → AI node → output).
- Introducing workflow-level features and the CoSense module to consolidate, reuse, and recombine design knowledge.
- Supporting non-linear, cross-modal, and iterative team–AI collaboration.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Layer 1: Embeds AI nodes into a shared whiteboard, enabling semantic and visual ideation through operations like divergence, decomposition, summarization, and image-to-text.
- Layer 2: Provides workflow-level features, including a workflow library for saving and reusing paths, and CoSense for consolidation and recommendation.
- Implementation: Combines rule-based retrieval and LLM-based augmentation for proactive suggestions and semantic expansion.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- CoNode significantly improved knowledge consolidation (M = 5.82 vs. baseline M = 4.22; p < .001), reuse (M = 5.83 vs. baseline M = 4.40; p < .001), and creative recombination (M = 5.35 vs. baseline M = 4.62; p = .013).
- Behavioral data showed higher content block collections (M = 8.60 vs. baseline M = 3.00; p < .001) and workflow reuse rates (63.6% vs. baseline).
- Teams using CoNode produced more final outputs (M = 8.47 vs. baseline M = 5.87; p = .004).
- Advantage over baselines:
- CoNode outperformed the baseline system in supporting shared understanding, reducing redundant work, and enabling efficient reuse and recombination of design knowledge.
- Its workflow-level features and CoSense module provided unique advantages in maintaining continuity and fostering creative exploration.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Study I (N = 12): Validated CoNode's foundational interaction paradigm, showing high usability (SUS score M = 77.48, SD = 7.81) and effective support for non-linear exploration.
- Study II (N = 30): Compared CoNode against a baseline system, demonstrating significant improvements in process knowledge management and team collaboration efficiency.
- Limitations and future work:
- Limited study duration prevents assessment of long-term knowledge evolution.
- Scalability challenges in larger teams and distributed collaboration settings.
- Opportunities to enhance generative capabilities (e.g., 3D modeling, counterfactual prompts) and refine recombination mechanisms to mitigate fixation.
Summary
CoNode introduces a novel interaction paradigm for generative AI in collaborative design, embedding AI nodes into a shared whiteboard and structuring reasoning through triplet workflows. Its workflow-level features and CoSense module enable efficient consolidation, reuse, and recombination of design knowledge, addressing fragmentation and context loss in early-stage ideation. Two user studies demonstrate CoNode's effectiveness in supporting non-linear, cross-modal exploration and enhancing team collaboration. By shifting AI from outcome generation to process knowledge evolution, CoNode offers valuable insights for advancing AI-powered creativity tools in industrial design.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Exploring The Impact of Proactive Generative AI Agent Roles In Time-Sensitive Collaborative Problem-Solving Tasks
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Towards AI as Colleagues: Multi-Agent System Improves Structured Ideation Processes
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
DuetUI: A Bidirectional Context Loop for Human-Agent Co-Generation of Task-Oriented Interfaces
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Framing 'Collaboration': How Human-Human Principles Translate into Human-AI Realities
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 67%
“I Felt Bad After We Ignored Her”: Understanding How Interface-Driven Social Prominence Shapes Group Discussions with GenAI
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 63%
Through the Lens of Human-Human Collaboration: An Configurable Research Platform for Exploring Human-Agent Collaboration
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
Studying Collaborative Interactive Machine Teaching in Image Classification
IUI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Interview-Informed Generative Agents for Product Discovery: A Validation Study
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 60%
Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI Interactions
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 60%
“It Became My Buddy, But I’m Not Afraid to Disagree”: A Multi-Session Study of UX Evaluators Collaborating with Conversational AI Assistants
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +4
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)